Student achievement goals and psychosomatic health complaints among Swedish adolescents: the role of sex

Abstract

Aim School related determinants (e.g. student motivation and goals) may be important for student achievement as well as their mental health. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse the links between two goal orientations (mastery and performance) and psychosomatic health problems by investigating the general patterns as well as the patterns for specific classifications of students, in particular by investigating the potential statistical interaction effects by gender. Subject and methods Swedish nationally representative data among 4573 school year 9 students (15-16 years old) responding to the Evaluation Through Follow-up (ETF) questionnaire, in 2014, were used. Linear regression analysis as well as multinomial logistic regression were applied in order to address the research questions. Results Both the mastery orientation and the performance orientation are independently associated with adolescent psychosomatic health problems. The links between these goal orientations and psychosomatic health show different patterns. The mastery goal orientation may be considered a protective factor as there is a negative link to psychosomatic problems; the performance orientation may be considered a risk factor due to the positive association with psychosomatic health problems. The effect of performance orientation on psychosomatic health complaints was significantly stronger for girls (OR = 4.28) compared to boys (OR = 2.04). In particular, low mastery/high performance students may be at risk for experiencing poor psychosomatic health. Conclusion Adolescent psychosomatic health may be improved by the encouragement of student goals related to adaptive and successful goal profiles such as mastery orientation.

The Association Among Achievement Goal Orientations, Academic Performance, and Academic Well-Being Among Chinese Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…Medical students’ performance-avoidance goals were positively correlated with academic stress and negatively related to learning adaptability, sleep quality, and subjective well-being. These results were inconsistent with a previous study on adolescents in public middle schools in China ( Tian et al, 2017 ), but were similarly to the findings of a previous study on students in compulsory school and upper-secondary school in Swedish ( Bergh and Giota, 2020 ). The reasons for these discrepancies may be the differences in cultural backgrounds and research objects.…”

Gender Differences In Functional Somatic Disorders Of Indigenous Adolescents In Khakassia

“…The average value in the age group of children and adolescents was 25.4%, which was significantly lower than in our study (40.1%). The results of the overall frequency of occurrence of RSL obtained by us were lower than those of researchers from some other countries (e.g., Britain -66% [17], Italy -65.9% [18]), but higher than in Sweden (16.6%) [19] and Turkey (30.5%) [20]. Data on the prevalence of FSD in the pediatric adolescent population of the Russian Federation are scarce [30].…”

“…FSD are currently an urgent problem in pediatrics, poorly covered in domestic pediatric practice. Research is carried out in different countries [3,5,10,12], climatic and geographical regions [13,14,15,16], socioeconomic conditions and places of residence (urban/rural), as well as among different age-sex groups and different contingents (hospital patients, organized children's groups) [17,18,19,20].…”

Students’ goal orientation and gamification in learning for academic performance: A systematic literature review

“…The research by Bostwick et al (2020) acknowledges that while cognitive factors like standardized test scores and high school GPA explain a portion of the variance in academic performance, non-cognitive factors could account for the remaining unexplained variance. These non-cognitive factors, including students' intrinsic beliefs and perseverance, can influence the approaches and strategies they implement in academic tasks and outcomes, such as achievement goals and GPA (Bergh & Giota, 2022;Yi et al, 2021).…”