2010 IEEE Electrical Design of Advanced Package &Amp; Systems Symposium 2010
DOI: 10.1109/edaps.2010.5683010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stub length prediction for back-drilled vias using a fast via tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In response, a variety of techniques have been developed, including using back drilling to reduce stub length and placing the glass cloth at an oblique angle to reduce unevenness, etc. [4][5][6][7] However, these techniques are neither sufficient to completely eliminate the via stub, nor the skew between the differential wiring. Therefore, with the aim of realizing a transmission configuration that is both stub-less and skew-free, we developed a novel transmission configuration, whereby a flexible printed circuit (FPC) dedicated to high-speed transmission was created and connected with the PKG by a solder bump (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response, a variety of techniques have been developed, including using back drilling to reduce stub length and placing the glass cloth at an oblique angle to reduce unevenness, etc. [4][5][6][7] However, these techniques are neither sufficient to completely eliminate the via stub, nor the skew between the differential wiring. Therefore, with the aim of realizing a transmission configuration that is both stub-less and skew-free, we developed a novel transmission configuration, whereby a flexible printed circuit (FPC) dedicated to high-speed transmission was created and connected with the PKG by a solder bump (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One method to decrease the discontinuities at the BGA/PCB interface is to perform chip-package-board co-design, so that the impedance in the entire signal path from die to board to another die changes smoothly instead of designing 100 Ω differential impedance for different segmentations independently [4]. As for the DC blocking via structure optimization, detailed work has been done and reported in [5], [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%