2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2015.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Struvite precipitation for ammonium removal from anaerobically treated effluents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This reaction was less efficient than the results presented by other authors. Nitrogen removal efficiency in landfill leachate reached about 80% (Huang et al, 2014) and anaerobically-treated wastewater reached 95% (Escudero et al, 2015). The low efficiency of nitrogen removal may be the result of calcium ions (around 0.01 mol$L À1 ).…”
Section: Nitrogen In Digestion Fluidmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This reaction was less efficient than the results presented by other authors. Nitrogen removal efficiency in landfill leachate reached about 80% (Huang et al, 2014) and anaerobically-treated wastewater reached 95% (Escudero et al, 2015). The low efficiency of nitrogen removal may be the result of calcium ions (around 0.01 mol$L À1 ).…”
Section: Nitrogen In Digestion Fluidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low efficiency of nitrogen removal may be the result of calcium ions (around 0.01 mol$L À1 ). Escudero et al showed that calcium ions also precipitated in the conditions required for struvite formation (Escudero et al, 2015). Thus, the presence of calcium and other cations may result in reduced ammonium removal efficiency.…”
Section: Nitrogen In Digestion Fluidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this, various low-cost materials such as seawater [25], bittern [26], and magnesite (MgCO 3 ) [27] are considered as a cheap alternative source of Mg +2 ions. The molar ratio of N : P in digestate varies from 2 : 1 to 4 : 1 [28], and in struvite it is 1:1. Therefore, the leachate after struvite precipitation still contains a large number of ammonium ions [19,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical and chemical-physical processes for ammonia removal can be rather classified as recovery techniques because they give rise to the precipitation of, e.g. struvite (MgNH 4 PO 4 ·6H 2 O) from raw digestate or its supernatant [13]. However, such recovery techniques have their drawbacks, such as high cost of chemicals and the need to strictly control the pH [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%