Strukturierte Befragung von Kindern bei Kindeswohlgefährdung: Die deutsche Version des NICHD-Interviewprotokolls in seiner revidierten Fassung

Noeker, Meinolf; Franke, Ingo

doi:10.1007/s00103-018-2838-4

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, since participants were recruited throughout Germany, the official translated German version of the R-NICHD protocol was used to extract the examples for each technique ( Noeker and Franke, 2018 ). The wording of the techniques was adapted to adult recipients.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Lastly, recent research has shown the significance of including cultural and contextual aspects in the translation process when it comes to the translation of investigative interview protocols for children (IIPCs) as compared to a mere direct translation process ( Navarro et al, 2019 ). Upon reading the official German translation of the R-NICHD protocol ( Noeker and Franke, 2018 ), which was used in this study, some translations appeared to be either sub-optimal or too complicated due to the grammatical structure of some translated statements when compared to the English R-NICHD protocol. Therefore, future research should address whether the translation of the (German) R-NICHD protocol needs to be reassessed and possibly improved.…”

Section: Limitations and Suggestions For Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessing the Individual Interviewer Rapport-Building and Supportive Techniques of the R-NICHD Protocol

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of the rapport-building and supportive techniques formulated by the R-NICHD protocol is intended to support children and increase the quality of their statements as well as disclosures without possessing suggestive potential. While the effectiveness of the entire R-NICHD protocol for children who have actually experienced child sexual abuse (CSA) has been supported by research, to date no study assessed the effect of each individual socio-emotional interview technique in both interviewees with and without CSA experiences. The current study aimed to address this gap in research by means of an online vignette-study, asking participants to rate the identified rapport-building and supportive techniques on the scales well-being, willingness to talk, and perceived pressure. A total of 187 participants were randomly assigned to either a hypothetical “abused” or a hypothetical “not abused” group by means of a vignette-manipulation. The results suggest that many socio-emotional interview techniques were perceived as supportive and non-suggestive, while a number of techniques were perceived as not supportive but suggestive. Few differences emerged between the hypothetical “abused” group and the hypothetical “not abused” control group. To conclude, most but not all rapport-building and supportive techniques proposed by the R-NICHD protocol had a positive effect on interviewees.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Limitations and Suggestions For Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the Individual Interviewer Rapport-Building and Supportive Techniques of the R-NICHD Protocol

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Besonders deutlich tritt die Divergenz zu den "Mindestanforderungen" bei Fragen hervor, die sowohl von psychologischen als auch von medizinischen Sachverständigen begutachtet werden können. Beispielsweise empfehlen im Hinblick auf die, keinem Fachgebiet eindeutig zuzuordnende Exploration von Kindern zu im Raum stehenden Gefährdungsereignissen die "Mindestanforderungen" nur sehr allgemein eine Exploration beteiligter Kinder (s. u. S. 12), während die für den medizinischen Bereich geltende Kinderschutzleitlinie (AWFM 2019, S. 202 f.) einen deutlichen Imperativ formuliert, strukturierte Explorationsverfahren, wie etwa das revidierte NICHD Protokoll (Noeker & Franke 2018) einzusetzen, das auch näher erläutert wird. Der Bindungsgrad solcher Leitlinien hängt vom Evidenzgrad ab.…”

Section: Qualitätsbegriffeunclassified