Structuring Research Related to Dynamic Risk Management for Autonomous Systems

Adler, Rasmus; Reich, Jan; Hawkins, Richard

doi:10.1007/978-3-031-40953-0_30

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the future, autonomy might become a disci-pline and research field of its own [14]. There are many definitions (e.g., [15][16][17]) involving different notions of autonomy [18]. One notion is that autonomous systems are not controlled or operated by a human operator.…”

Section: Ai-based Autonomymentioning

confidence: 99%

Defining and Researching “Dynamic Systems of Systems”

Adler,

Elberzhager,

Falcão

et al. 2024

Software

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital transformation is advancing across industries, enabling products, processes, and business models that change the way we communicate, interact, and live. It radically influences the evolution of existing systems of systems (SoSs), such as mobility systems, production systems, energy systems, or cities, that have grown over a long time. In this article, we discuss what this means for the future of software engineering based on the results of a research project called DynaSoS. We present the data collection methods we applied, including interviews, a literature review, and workshops. As one contribution, we propose a classification scheme for deriving and structuring research challenges and directions. The scheme comprises two dimensions: scope and characteristics. The scope motivates and structures the trend toward an increasingly connected world. The characteristics enhance and adapt established SoS characteristics in order to include novel aspects and to better align them with the structuring of research into different research areas or communities. As a second contribution, we present research challenges using the classification scheme. We have observed that a scheme puts research challenges into context, which is needed for interpreting them. Accordingly, we conclude that our proposals contribute to a common understanding and vision for engineering dynamic SoS.

show abstract

Section: Ai-based Autonomymentioning

confidence: 99%