2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structuring fuzzy integrated multi-stages evaluation model on academic personnel recruitment in MET institutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many other multi-attribute evaluation methods that can be combined with fuzzy logic such as TOPSIS and ELECTRE as presented in the literature [25][26][27][28][29]. The application of these methods to ship officer performance evaluation problem with more evaluation criteria might be suggested for further research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many other multi-attribute evaluation methods that can be combined with fuzzy logic such as TOPSIS and ELECTRE as presented in the literature [25][26][27][28][29]. The application of these methods to ship officer performance evaluation problem with more evaluation criteria might be suggested for further research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is summarized below (Celik, Kandakoglu, & Er 2009): After the aggregated pairwise comparison matrix,Ẽ a , is obtained, the fuzzy weight matrix is calculated by Buckley's (1985) method as follows:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, the methodology of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) implemented by Buckley (1985) was employed. Fuzzy AHPs have been applied across a range of fields, including construction (Hsieh et al 2004;Jaskowski et al 2010), education (Goksu 2008;Celik, Kandakoglu, & Er 2009), human resources (Chou et al 2012), location selection (Bilisik et al 2014), marine engineering (Miri Lavasani et al 2011;Wang & Chin 2011;Celik & Kandakoglu 2012;Yanar & Tozan 2012), the automotive industry (Nepal et al 2010;Badizadeh & Khanmohammadi 2011;Bilgen & Sen 2012;Ghadimi et al 2012;Rathi et al 2015), supplier selection (Chan et al 2008;Kilincci & Onal 2011;Yucenur et al 2011;Shaw et al 2012;Rezaei et al 2014) and technology management (Erensal et al 2006). A comprehensive description of the methodology is expounded in the next section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the number of alternatives is small, the pairwise comparison method is applicable. For example, Celik, Kandakoglu and Deha Er [37] proposed a multi-stage evaluation model under multiple criteria in order to manage the academic personnel selection and development in maritime education and training institutions. However, if the alternatives' number is large, such as 20 candidates and 190-times of comparison, most published methods are not suitable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%