2015
DOI: 10.1086/682734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structuring an Action Net of Public Library Membership

Abstract: A B S T R A C TThis article introduces a theoretical framework for conceptualizing public library membership and belonging as an ongoing action net of joint intention and collective action between individual members of the public and the library. It provides an analysis of how membership is constituted, observed, and documented by public libraries from a social-constructivist perspective. Drawing on social theory and philosophy, organizational studies, and secondary public library data sources, a high-level ty… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cavanagh considers the social mode of public libraries from the viewpoint of “a social constructivist perspective” and examines the membership of public libraries from this perspective (Cavanagh, 2015, p. 407). Cavanagh concludes that “the political mode of public library organizing is rooted in citizenship, residency, and a historical tradition oriented as a grassroots community organization responding to its immediate public” (Cavanagh, 2015, p. 413). The group examined in this paper has roots in the social movement of the establishment of community libraries and follows the traditional spirit of “civic librarianship” (Cavanagh, 2015, p. 413).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cavanagh considers the social mode of public libraries from the viewpoint of “a social constructivist perspective” and examines the membership of public libraries from this perspective (Cavanagh, 2015, p. 407). Cavanagh concludes that “the political mode of public library organizing is rooted in citizenship, residency, and a historical tradition oriented as a grassroots community organization responding to its immediate public” (Cavanagh, 2015, p. 413). The group examined in this paper has roots in the social movement of the establishment of community libraries and follows the traditional spirit of “civic librarianship” (Cavanagh, 2015, p. 413).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cavanagh concludes that “the political mode of public library organizing is rooted in citizenship, residency, and a historical tradition oriented as a grassroots community organization responding to its immediate public” (Cavanagh, 2015, p. 413). The group examined in this paper has roots in the social movement of the establishment of community libraries and follows the traditional spirit of “civic librarianship” (Cavanagh, 2015, p. 413).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conversational ecology identified by boyd et al (2010) provides a framework for understanding how libraries use Twitter to not simply engage with their members, but converse with their membership. Traditional understandings of library membership tend to rely on membership registration, library use statistics, and geographical area to define to define membership; however, Cavanagh (2015) argues these understandings overlook the active nature of public library membership. For instance, a person does not have to hold a library card in order to follow a library on Twitter; however, that individual still creates a relationship with the library by choosing to follow the library's Twitter account.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a person does not have to hold a library card in order to follow a library on Twitter; however, that individual still creates a relationship with the library by choosing to follow the library's Twitter account. By overlaying boyd et al 's (2010) understanding of the syntactic conversation conventions of Twitter on Cavanagh's (2015) understanding of public library membership, we hope to explore the different conversations and conversational contexts that public libraries participate in online.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%