2003
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44826-8_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structuring Agents for Adaptation

Abstract: Abstract. Agents need to be able to adapt to the dynamic nature of the environments in which they operate. Automated adaptation is an option that is only feasible if enough structure is provided. This paper describes a componentbased structure within which dependencies between components are made explicit. An example of a simple web-page analysis agent is used to illustrate the structuring principles and elements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also approaches where only a specification of the agent is migrated (E.g. agent blueprints in the Dutch Agent Factory [21]). The destination agency is then able to rebuild the agent based on this specification making use of components the agency contains.…”
Section: Agent Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are also approaches where only a specification of the agent is migrated (E.g. agent blueprints in the Dutch Agent Factory [21]). The destination agency is then able to rebuild the agent based on this specification making use of components the agency contains.…”
Section: Agent Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Port-Based Adaptable Agent Architecture (PB3A) [19], Component Architecture for Service Agents (CASA) [20] and the Dutch Agent Factory [21] also contain agents which exhibit compositional adaptivity. An agent-oriented software engineering approach to dynamic agent systems is presented in [22].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One important assumption on which the Agent Factory is based is that the artefacts, the agents, have been designed to be redesigned. This implies, (see [19] for more detail) that (1) agents have a compositional structure with reusable parts; (2) at least two levels of description of agent configurations are defined: conceptual and operational; (3) an ontology to describe the functionality, behaviour and state of agents and their components.…”
Section: The Artefactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , φ n y in conflict, the candidate agent with the best extracted k Aj is selected (lines [13][14][15][16][17][18]. This represents a decision taken through a heuristics: k is an amount of weight that can be "safely" extracted from a formula during its partial model checking (see Rmk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%