1984
DOI: 10.1021/ja00334a034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structures of two isomers of hexairidium hexadecacarbonyl

Abstract: a chair ~n f o r m a t i o n .~~ The results show that the HOMO orbital is primarily a *-type orbital centered on sulfur b and delocalized somewhat on sulfur a (Figure 3). The LUMO orbital is a mixture of the d+3 and d2 orbitals. The lowest energy transition (HOMO -L U M O ) is thus described as a S(a) -Ti charge-transfer transition. The photochemistry of the Cp2TiSS complex is essentially wavelength independent. To explain this observation, we must either propose that fast internal conversion to the lowest en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
27
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[5] However, in solution they show very different behaviors. Indeed, Rh 6 (CO) 16 possesses an O h symmetry and its spectrum, reported by Heaton et al, [6] is characterized by two resonances, in a 3:1 ratio, at δ = 180.1 and at 231.5 ppm attributed to the terminal and bridging (µ 3 ) carbonyl ligands, respectively.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[5] However, in solution they show very different behaviors. Indeed, Rh 6 (CO) 16 possesses an O h symmetry and its spectrum, reported by Heaton et al, [6] is characterized by two resonances, in a 3:1 ratio, at δ = 180.1 and at 231.5 ppm attributed to the terminal and bridging (µ 3 ) carbonyl ligands, respectively.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Ir 6 (CO) 15 ] 2-shows 12 terminal and three edge-bridging CO ligands, [4] while Ir 6 (CO) 16 has been isolated in two different isomeric forms: a red and a black isomer, the latter being quite unstable. [5] Our aim is to elucidate and compare the particular spectroscopic properties of the [Ir 6 (CO) 15 ] 2-and Ir 6 (CO) 16 complexes, using a combined experimental-theoretical approach, employing solid-state NMR and DFT calculations of 13 C NMR chemical shifts. Within this paper the discussion of only the red isomer of Ir 6 (CO) 16 has been taken into account.…”
Section: δ(Co-co) ͼ δ(Rh-co) ͼ δ(Ir-co)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 ] (2.77 ); the former value was determined both by X-ray diffraction [10] and by EXAFS spectroscopy, [1] as was the latter. [19,20] The implication of the comparison is that the clusters in the presence of H 2 , propene, and mixtures of H 2 propene had a substantial number of coordinated ligands. However, theoretical calculations by density functional methods have shown that Ir 4 clusters supported on zeolite NaY have essentially this same distance when only a single carbon or hydrogen ligand is present in addition to the support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clusters from Ir 18 to Ir 39 on Ir(111) have been studied [50], finding a preference for planar hexagonal shapes. The Gates group has performed extensive experiments using carbonyl precursors such as Ir 4 (CO) 12 [51] and Ir 6 (CO) 16 [52], with review articles available [53,54]. Flow treatment by H 2 removes all carbonyls, leaving a bare Ir 4 or Ir 6 cluster on γ -alumina.…”
Section: Catalyst Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%