2005
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0502089102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structures of microfilament destabilizing toxins bound to actin provide insight into toxin design and activity

Abstract: Marine macrolides that disrupt the actin cytoskeleton are promising candidates for cancer treatment. Here, we present the actinbound x-ray crystal structures of reidispongiolide A and C and sphinxolide B, three marine macrolides found among a recently discovered family of cytotoxic compounds. Their structures allow unequivocal assignment of the absolute configuration for each compound. A comparison of their actin-binding site to macrolides found in the trisoxazole family, as well as the divalent macrolide, swi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
72
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
72
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Two subsequent studies have led to additional independent crystal forms of actin in which the monomers are again related by pure translation in the longitudinal direction with an interface similar to that described earlier (Allingham et al, 2005;Rizvi et al, 2006). Finally, another actin structure has been reported in which two actin monomers are present in one asymmetric unit of the crystal (Klenchin et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two subsequent studies have led to additional independent crystal forms of actin in which the monomers are again related by pure translation in the longitudinal direction with an interface similar to that described earlier (Allingham et al, 2005;Rizvi et al, 2006). Finally, another actin structure has been reported in which two actin monomers are present in one asymmetric unit of the crystal (Klenchin et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…One coordinate set was obtained from the crystal structure of the cross-linked actin dimer reported previously (Kudryashov et al, 2005); this crystal is isomorphous with one obtained from a noncross-linked actin mutant in complex with either ATP or ADP (Rould et al, 2006). Four other coordinate sets were obtained from structures in which actin monomers were not cross-linked to each other but were nonetheless seen to form a similar interface between longitudinally related monomers in the crystal (Allingham et al, 2005;Klenchin et al, 2006;Otomo et al, 2005;Rizvi et al, 2006; Table 3). These six models are derived from six independent crystal forms whose unit-cell parameters and crystal contacts (apart from those representing the longitudinal interface) are distinct.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Longitudinal Interface Observed In Multiplmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diverse mechanisms targeting the cytoskeleton dynamics have been reported for several depolymerizing macrolide toxins that interact directly with actin. They include sequestering of G-actin to inhibit its addition to the polymer, capping the barbed-ends of actin filaments to prevent filament growth, and even severing of F-actin [27,31,35,36]. Some authors indicated that Factin disassembly induced by PTX-2 and PTX-6 was associated with an increase in G-actin [23,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was then followed by an HRP-conjugated secondary antibody against mouse IgM or IgG, respectively, and chemiluminescent detection. F-actin was prepared from G-actin by adding 1/10 volume of actin polymerization buffer (500 mM KCl, 20 mM, MgCl 2 , 10 mM ATP) based on an established procedure (44).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%