2018
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.ra117.001097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structures of human calpain-3 protease core with and without bound inhibitor reveal mechanisms of calpain activation

Abstract: Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2a arises from mutations in the Ca 2+ -activated intracellular cysteine protease calpain-3. This calpain isoform is abundant in skeletal muscle and differs from the main isoforms, calpain-1 and -2, in being a homodimer and having two short insertion sequences. The first of these, IS1, interrupts the protease core and must be cleaved for activation and substrate binding. Here, to learn how calpain-3 can be regulated and inhibited, we determined the structures of the calpain-3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The origin of this modification of activity could be an indirect loss of catalytic activity and possibly a modification of interactions with partners due to conformational changes in the protein structure. Indeed, using the available information regarding the calpain-3 structure, we locate the c.1333G>A [p.(Gly445Arg)] CAPN3 variant in the calpain b-sandwich domain (CBSW) interacting with the penta-EF-hand domain (PEF) supposedly involved in the dimerization of two calpain-3 units [37]. Interestingly, the c.1333G>A [p.(Gly445Arg)] CAPN3 variant is located on a loop of the CBSW domain that has interactions with the PEF domain, and is expected to be involved in the communication of Ca 2+ -induced conformational change throughout these domains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The origin of this modification of activity could be an indirect loss of catalytic activity and possibly a modification of interactions with partners due to conformational changes in the protein structure. Indeed, using the available information regarding the calpain-3 structure, we locate the c.1333G>A [p.(Gly445Arg)] CAPN3 variant in the calpain b-sandwich domain (CBSW) interacting with the penta-EF-hand domain (PEF) supposedly involved in the dimerization of two calpain-3 units [37]. Interestingly, the c.1333G>A [p.(Gly445Arg)] CAPN3 variant is located on a loop of the CBSW domain that has interactions with the PEF domain, and is expected to be involved in the communication of Ca 2+ -induced conformational change throughout these domains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three specific regions of CAPN3 (NS, IS1, and IS2) are shown in blue. Schematics have been modified from Ye et al, 2018 [82]. The right panel depicts the estimated tertiary structure of CAPN3.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exon–intron junctions of the CAPN3 gene as well as the functional domains of CALPAIN 3 are visualized. The CALPAIN 3 domain nomenclature is shown according to Ono et al (2016) and Ye et al (2018). (b) Three hundred and eighty‐one clinically relevant CAPN3 variants (pathogenic, likely pathogenic and uncertain/conflicting) from LOVD and ClinVar databases are visualized along the CAPN3 gene with SpliceAI scores on the y ‐axis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PP3 was also assigned if two out of three algorithms (HSF, MaxEntScan, SpliceAI) indicated an impact on splicing. PM1 score was assigned for variants affecting highly conserved positions located in the Protease Core subdomains 1 and 2 (PC1 and PC2) of the Calpain‐type cysteine Protease conserved (CysPc) domain (amino acids 48–267, 316–415), in the calpain‐type β‐sandwich domain (CBSW, amino acids 429–586), or in the penta‐EF‐hand domain (PEF, amino acids 647–821; Ono, Ojima, Shinkai‐Ouchi, Hata, & Sorimachi, 2016; Ye, Campbell, & Davies, 2018). The position conservation was visualized by the VarMap web tool (Stephenson et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%