1993
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(93)90036-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structures and vibrational frequencies of FOOF and FONO using density functional theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 The use of cc-pVmZ basis sets, however, deteriorates the performance of DFT irrespective of the functional used so that the LDA results of Table 2 cannot compete with results of previous investigations based on HF-optimized basis sets (Table 5). 21,22 Similarly as for the MP2 and CCSD(T) description of 1, we find that for certain compositions of the basis set a fortuitously accurate geometry of 1 is obtained; however, if standard correlation consistent basis sets are stepwise increased to reach the CBS limit at DFT, the resulting geometry will be less accurate than the CCSD(T)/CBS limit geometry obtained with the aug-cc-pVmZ basis sets. This holds for all functionals applied in this work where the B3LYP functional performs better than both the BLYP and mPW1PW91 functionals.…”
Section: Ccsd(t) Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…21 The use of cc-pVmZ basis sets, however, deteriorates the performance of DFT irrespective of the functional used so that the LDA results of Table 2 cannot compete with results of previous investigations based on HF-optimized basis sets (Table 5). 21,22 Similarly as for the MP2 and CCSD(T) description of 1, we find that for certain compositions of the basis set a fortuitously accurate geometry of 1 is obtained; however, if standard correlation consistent basis sets are stepwise increased to reach the CBS limit at DFT, the resulting geometry will be less accurate than the CCSD(T)/CBS limit geometry obtained with the aug-cc-pVmZ basis sets. This holds for all functionals applied in this work where the B3LYP functional performs better than both the BLYP and mPW1PW91 functionals.…”
Section: Ccsd(t) Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The fluorine peroxide molecule is well known to be a very difficult problem [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] for standard ab initio method. While barriers have not been experimentally measured, they are expected to be higher than those of hydrogen peroxide.…”
Section: Fluorine Peroxide F 2 Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[106] B3LYP/6-311 + +G(2d,2p) results are off by more than AE 0.05 . [107] None of the DFT calculations reported by Jursic [109,110] using different functionals (SVWN, BECKE3LYP, BECKE3P86, BLYP, BP86) with 6-311 + + G(2d) basis sets reproduces the two bond lengths better than AE 0.02 . B3LYP and PBE methods with cc-pVDZ to cc-pVQZ basis sets do not produce satisfactory results.…”
Section: Fo-ofmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For more than 30 years a large number of calculations using almost every quantum chemical ab initio method available, such as HF, MP2, MP3, MP4, CISD, QCISD, CEPA, CCSD, CCSD(T), QCISD(T), CASSCF and CCI, as well as DFT methods were reported. [93,[98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116] A summary of calculations performed before the year 2000 is given by Kraka and Cremer. [112] Most of these calculations fail strongly to reproduce the experimental geometry and Schaefer called this molecule a "nightmare for theoreticians".…”
Section: Fo-ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation