2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2015.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structured UH model for clays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some models have assumed a larger yield surface for cemented soil, which is progressively reduced during bond degradation. By comparing the yield surface size of cemented soil p c and the corresponding uncemented soil p c0 , the bonding effect can be assessed by evaluating the additional strength ∆p c = p c − p c0 [7,8] or the strength ratio R * = p c0 /p c [9][10][11]. Alternatively, in the disturbed state concept [12,13], cemented soil is modeled by a combination of material parts at relatively intact and fully adjusted states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some models have assumed a larger yield surface for cemented soil, which is progressively reduced during bond degradation. By comparing the yield surface size of cemented soil p c and the corresponding uncemented soil p c0 , the bonding effect can be assessed by evaluating the additional strength ∆p c = p c − p c0 [7,8] or the strength ratio R * = p c0 /p c [9][10][11]. Alternatively, in the disturbed state concept [12,13], cemented soil is modeled by a combination of material parts at relatively intact and fully adjusted states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%