2022
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12081344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structured Reporting in Radiological Settings: Pitfalls and Perspectives

Abstract: Objective: The aim of this manuscript is to give an overview of structured reporting in radiological settings. Materials and Method: This article is a narrative review on structured reporting in radiological settings. Particularly, limitations and future perspectives are analyzed. RESULTS: The radiological report is a communication tool for the referring physician and the patients. It was conceived as a free text report (FTR) to allow radiologists to have their own individuality in the description of the radio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 112 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 There has been a gradual shift in imaging reporting to a standardized, structured report to improve communication, reduce misinterpretation, ensure completeness, allow report comparability, and facilitate research. [24][25][26] Moreover, the addition of a structured language/lexicon for the description of imaging findings can also improve report clarity. In this regard, there has been successful integration of imaging Reporting And Data Systems (RADS) in other domains of radiology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 There has been a gradual shift in imaging reporting to a standardized, structured report to improve communication, reduce misinterpretation, ensure completeness, allow report comparability, and facilitate research. [24][25][26] Moreover, the addition of a structured language/lexicon for the description of imaging findings can also improve report clarity. In this regard, there has been successful integration of imaging Reporting And Data Systems (RADS) in other domains of radiology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%