Structured nursing educational programs improve quality of life outcomes in patients with Cushing’s syndrome

Llahana, Sofia; Thomas, Nicola

doi:10.1007/s12020-016-0934-5

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Eight literature reviews were identified in the search, addressing QOL [4, 10–12], paediatric patients [13], and neurocognitive and psychological functioning [14–16].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Illustration of patient-reported outcome challenges and solutions in rare diseases: a systematic review in Cushing’s syndrome

Knoble

Nayroles

Cheng

et al. 2018

Orphanet J Rare Dis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rare diseases are often not fully understood and efforts put in investigating it from patient perspective are usually met with challenges. We performed a systematic literature review (SLR) for the last 20 years in Cushing’s Syndrome (CS) to illustrate Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) challenges, and show what solutions were found.PROs and other Clinical Outcome Assessment (COA) used with CS patients were reviewed in 36 studies. Two CS-specific Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) measures were identified (i.e., CushingQoL, Tuebingen CD-25), as well as depression and neurocognitive measures. For CS-specific HRQL measures, the CushingQoL was the most widely used measure due in part to being the first CS-specific HRQL measure developed. With algorithms mapping the CushingQoL to both the SF-6D and EQ-5D, the CushingQoL could be used to facilitate economic modelling studies in the absence of a generic HRQL measure. While the CushingQoL offers only the global scale and two subscales compared to the six subscales of the Tuebingen CD-25, there is not yet adequate statistical validation data available for the Tuebingen CD-25 to suggest it can withstand the scrutiny of review by multiple stakeholders. Results of this review indicate that the inclusion of a measure of depressive symptoms, such as the BDI-II or similar measure, would be reasonable to include given the high level of comorbidity of depression among CS patients. A brief neurocognitive performance outcome, such as Trail Making tasks A and D or Digit Symbol, could help inform the interpretation of HRQL results. Neurocognitive differences may be an unassessed mediator of HRQL outcomes, partly accounting for the persistence of depressive symptoms and HRQL deficits despite treatment. Results suggest that HRQL improvements are possible within this population. These results are limited by small sample sizes and pre/post study design.CS showcases the difficulties encountered in measuring PROs in rare diseases. A solution for this specific case was developed in the form of dedicated PRO instruments, the CushingQOL and the Tuebingen-25. However, some aspects of CS may not be fully answered or not yet validated (e.g., depressive and cognitive symptoms). Further research needs to be done to address them.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-018-0958-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

“…Eight literature reviews were identified in the search, addressing QOL [4, 10–12], paediatric patients [13], and neurocognitive and psychological functioning [14–16].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%