2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24668-8_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structured Errors in Optical Gigabit Ethernet Packets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also found that certain data values had a substantially higher probability of being received in error than others: error hot-spotting [4]. Further sets of wide-ranging experiments allowed us to conclude that Ethernet frames containing a given octet of certain value were up to 100 times more likely to be received in error (and thus dropped), when compared with a similarly sized packet that did not contain such octets [5].…”
Section: Higher Layer Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also found that certain data values had a substantially higher probability of being received in error than others: error hot-spotting [4]. Further sets of wide-ranging experiments allowed us to conclude that Ethernet frames containing a given octet of certain value were up to 100 times more likely to be received in error (and thus dropped), when compared with a similarly sized packet that did not contain such octets [5].…”
Section: Higher Layer Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Previous work showed that the relationship between bit error rate and power at the receiver could not offer a prediction of the outcome for packet error rate versus receiver power [4]. This is due to the processing of the data through the network stack, and in particular the effects of line coding at the physical and data-link layers.…”
Section: B Bit Error Rate and Packet Error Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In past work we illustrated how bit errors are position independent but have a dependence upon the encoded data [6]. We found that the errors occur uniformly across any data packet, independent of packet size, and that there are no correlations evident between the positions of errors within the frame.…”
Section: Packet Error Rate Versus Bebmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Both the errors occurring on a WDM connection and the protection scheme have an impact on the PER for the packets transmitted over that channel. In a low power regime, [8] shows that 8B/10B block-coding causes a non-deterministic relationship between PER and BER in optical GigE. Therefore, PER monitoring does not seem a substitute to BER monitoring, but rather a complement.…”
Section: L3 Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%