2019
DOI: 10.3390/genes10030232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure-Specific Endonucleases and the Resolution of Chromosome Underreplication

Abstract: Complete genome duplication in every cell cycle is fundamental for genome stability and cell survival. However, chromosome replication is frequently challenged by obstacles that impede DNA replication fork (RF) progression, which subsequently causes replication stress (RS). Cells have evolved pathways of RF protection and restart that mitigate the consequences of RS and promote the completion of DNA synthesis prior to mitotic chromosome segregation. If there is entry into mitosis with underreplicated chromosom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 210 publications
(307 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, chromosomes other than XII manifest the same PFGE behaviour much later in the cell cycle; after replication appears to have ended by both FACS and PFGE (Figures 1, 2, 4, 5, S1, S3-S7). A closer look at this late PFGE behaviour suggests it is independent of transition between cell cycle stages (i.e., Sphase to metaphase to anaphase) and the key spatial and molecular changes that occur in such transitions (e.g., activation of structure-specific endonucleases, spindle pulling forces, hypercondensation by Cdc14, etc) [2,49] (Figure 7a), which are particularly enriched when cells cannot sense RF problems [56]. This scenario is compatible with the presence of Rad52independent NN-2D X-shaped signals (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, chromosomes other than XII manifest the same PFGE behaviour much later in the cell cycle; after replication appears to have ended by both FACS and PFGE (Figures 1, 2, 4, 5, S1, S3-S7). A closer look at this late PFGE behaviour suggests it is independent of transition between cell cycle stages (i.e., Sphase to metaphase to anaphase) and the key spatial and molecular changes that occur in such transitions (e.g., activation of structure-specific endonucleases, spindle pulling forces, hypercondensation by Cdc14, etc) [2,49] (Figure 7a), which are particularly enriched when cells cannot sense RF problems [56]. This scenario is compatible with the presence of Rad52independent NN-2D X-shaped signals (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that the cell cycle machinery itself regulates MiDAS. Accordingly, Cdk1 kinase, the major regulator of mitosis, phosphorylates EME1 and SLX4 at the onset of mitosis to promote their interaction to form an SLX-MUS complex (SLX1-SLX4-MUS81-EME1) [82,187] (Table 1). This mechanism is similar to the one described for budding yeast, in which the orthologues Mus81-Mms4 are hyperactivated at the G2/M transition by Cdc28/Cdk1 and Cdc5 (polo-like kinase 1 or Plk1 in vertebrates) [81,188].…”
Section: Mitotic Dna Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Replication stress may have a dual role of initiating micronuclei formation and promoting DSBs within the micronucleus once it has been formed. The delayed/stalled replication observed in micronuclei may cause a large number of unresolved replication intermediates, which are known to trigger endonuclease-dependent DSB formation [14]; and upon mitotic entry (following disruption of the micronuclear/nuclear membranes), the DNA damage response pathway will then promote the repair of the massive DSBs, leading to chromothripsis.…”
Section: Chromothripsis and Micronucleus Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%