2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.06.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure-specific analytical PID tuning for load disturbance rejection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Achieving reference input tracking and disturbance rejection simultaneously can be difficult in some cases, especially when the available information is limited or when the system is highly nonlinear. In those cases, the use of advanced control techniques or more complex models may be considered to achieve the desired performance [33,34]. In order to overcome this limitation of traditional 1DOF_PID, a two-degree-of-freedom (2DOF_PID) controller has emerged where setpoint tracking and disturbance rejection can be achieved separately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Achieving reference input tracking and disturbance rejection simultaneously can be difficult in some cases, especially when the available information is limited or when the system is highly nonlinear. In those cases, the use of advanced control techniques or more complex models may be considered to achieve the desired performance [33,34]. In order to overcome this limitation of traditional 1DOF_PID, a two-degree-of-freedom (2DOF_PID) controller has emerged where setpoint tracking and disturbance rejection can be achieved separately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without adding any new element to the control structure, a passive strategy consists of selecting the proper controller tuning for disturbance rejection. In that sense, [5] and [6] propose tuning rules that improve disturbance response; [7] exposes a robust design for PI synthesis; [8] presents a pole placement technique that consists of avoiding plateaus in frequency response from disturbance to output, and [9]proposes an optimal PI tuning through genetic algorithms. Furthermore, [10] proves that a PI itself can act like a controller plus and observer in certain kind of systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, controller synthesis has recently taken into consideration disturbance rejection, rather than set-point tracking. For instance, by means of One-Degree-of-Freedom (1-DOF) PID structure, set-point tracking performance and disturbance rejection requirements cannot generally be simultaneously achieved for control applications [17]. In order to circumvent this drawback, a Two-Degree-of-Freedom (2-DOF) PID was presented in [18], [19] so as the set-point tracking and the disturbance rejection can be handled by tuning a PID controller for each control loop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%