2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.9b00244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure–Property Relationship in an Organic Semiconductor: Insights from Energy Frameworks, Charge Density Analysis, and Diode Devices

Abstract: A lightweight organic material, trans-4′-dimethylamino-4-nitro-α-cyanostilbene, exhibits notable charge carrier mobility (∼10–4 cm2 V–1 s–1). The non-centrosymmetric material also displays moderate second harmonic generation activity. This is one of the rarest examples of small organic materials displaying semiconductor characteristics. The charge-transfer pathway as elucidated via high-resolution single-crystal X-ray diffraction data based “energy frameworks” and “experimental charge density” analyses is asse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all three cases, the scale factors vary only by 2–4% with respect to the resolutions of the diffraction data, and the distributions of the experimental and expected residuals are in good agreement. The quality of the multipole model and the data are in good agreement with those reported in the literature. , The atom labeling scheme (Figure ) as followed for 1a is also followed for 1b and 1c . The Hirshfeld rigid bond test applied for each pair of non-H atoms resulting the largest values of the difference between the components of the U ij tensor along the bond are 8 × 10 –4 Å 2 for N3–C17 and N3–C16 bonds in 1a , 8 × 10 –4 Å 2 for N3–C16 bond in 1b , and 9 × 10 –4 Å 2 for N1–C5 bond in 1c , which are well within the acceptable limit of 10 –3 Å 2 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In all three cases, the scale factors vary only by 2–4% with respect to the resolutions of the diffraction data, and the distributions of the experimental and expected residuals are in good agreement. The quality of the multipole model and the data are in good agreement with those reported in the literature. , The atom labeling scheme (Figure ) as followed for 1a is also followed for 1b and 1c . The Hirshfeld rigid bond test applied for each pair of non-H atoms resulting the largest values of the difference between the components of the U ij tensor along the bond are 8 × 10 –4 Å 2 for N3–C17 and N3–C16 bonds in 1a , 8 × 10 –4 Å 2 for N3–C16 bond in 1b , and 9 × 10 –4 Å 2 for N1–C5 bond in 1c , which are well within the acceptable limit of 10 –3 Å 2 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The molecule is found to be packed in cofacial 1D π-stacking. Molecular packing in the form of cofacial π-stacking is more favorable for the efficient charge transport than the herringbone or 2D brick layer packing due to the larger π-orbital overlapping . This type of 1D self-assembly of molecules is the primary requirement to realize a host of one-dimensional organic nanostructures such as nanowires, nanoribbons, etc .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the charge transfer properties (hole and electron mobility) of any organic semiconductor, the knowledge of the crystal packing motif is the primary requirement. We predicted the crystal structure, viz., the molecular packing, of our newly designed NNDMNH 2 molecule by employing density functional theory in which the experimental crystal structure of trans -4-nitro-4′-dimethylamino-α-cyanostilbene (NNDMCN) was used as the initial guess since these two molecules differ only by one functional group in their π-conjugated backbones. Starting from the experimental crystal structure of the NNDMCN as mentioned, we optimized the unit cell of NNDMNH 2 using the method of steepest descent (conjugate gradient algorithm) as implemented in the plane wave DFT code VASP. The optimization procedure was carried out within the generalized gradient approximation with van der Waals corrections [optimized Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof vdW (optPBE-vdW)] in several steps, including ion relaxation, change of cell shape, and change of cell volume, or a combination of these parameters to attain the ground state structure.…”
Section: Methodologies and Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations