2010
DOI: 10.1135/cccc2009093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure, properties and comparison of C,N-chelated and amido-stabilized plumbylenes

Abstract: The molecular structure of {2-[(CH3)2NCH2]C6H4}2Pb (1) in the solid state was determined by X-ray diffraction techniques on a single crystalline material. Bulky amido ligand stabilized complexes [(i-C3H7)2C6H3]NHLi (2) and [(i-C3H7)2C6H3N(Me3Si)]2Pb (3) were synthesized and characterized both in the solid state and solution by 1H, 13C, 15N and 207Pb NMR and XRD techniques. The structure of both C,N-chelated and bulky amido plumbylenes is compared.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tin-tin bond length (2.804(4) Å) compares well to standard Sn-Sn bond distances of 2.78 Å in Me 6 Sn 2 , as found in the vapour phase by GED (gas electron diffraction), and of 2.763(2) Å in Ph 6 Sn 2 [8]. On the other hand, the Sn-Sn bond distance of 4.2364 Å in the complex of Piers [1] and of 3.5567 Å in 4 [6] indicates very weak contacts in both complexes, if any. The coordination sphere of the zirconium and tin atoms is essentially tetrahedral, with the two Cp rings and the two oxygen atoms for the zirconium atom, and an oxygen atom, the nitrogen atom from the amidic ligand, the n-butyl carbon atom and the second tin atom for each of the tin atoms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The tin-tin bond length (2.804(4) Å) compares well to standard Sn-Sn bond distances of 2.78 Å in Me 6 Sn 2 , as found in the vapour phase by GED (gas electron diffraction), and of 2.763(2) Å in Ph 6 Sn 2 [8]. On the other hand, the Sn-Sn bond distance of 4.2364 Å in the complex of Piers [1] and of 3.5567 Å in 4 [6] indicates very weak contacts in both complexes, if any. The coordination sphere of the zirconium and tin atoms is essentially tetrahedral, with the two Cp rings and the two oxygen atoms for the zirconium atom, and an oxygen atom, the nitrogen atom from the amidic ligand, the n-butyl carbon atom and the second tin atom for each of the tin atoms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Because of its thermal instability, even at 20°C, compound 9 could not be isolated and identified. The reaction course differs from the one reported by Piers et al who used the bulky CH[(SiMe 3 )] 2 ligand [1] as well as the C,N chelating ligand for ensuring the stabilization of stannylene 1 [6]. In the case of the stannylene stabilized by the amido ligand 7, we observed migration of the n-butyl group from zirconium to tin, followed by elimination of one of the amido ligands and complexation with one half equivalent of dicyclopentadienylzirconium, providing compound 9.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to our recently reported stannylene and plumbylene compounds 25 also a few other zirconocene stannylene complexes, 2628 two recently reported examples of titanocene silylene complexes, 29,30 and an example of a silylene hafnocene complex 31 are known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%