2019
DOI: 10.1002/ange.201904021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure Optimisation of Large Transition‐Metal Complexes with Extended Tight‐Binding Methods

Abstract: Large transition-metal complexes are used in numerous areas of chemistry.C omputer-aided theoretical investigations of such complexes are limited by the sheer size of real systems often consisting of hundreds to thousands of atoms.Accordingly,the development and thorough evaluation of fast semi-empirical quantum chemistry methods that are universally applicable to al arge part of the periodic table is indispensable.H erein, we report on the capability of the recently developed GFNn-xTB method family for full q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GFN2 parametrization is less empirical than the GFN1 and it was proven to be more robust in geometry optimization. 84 The tight optimization level was used in the GFN2-xTB calculations to set the convergence thresholds to 1•10 −6 E h (energy) and 8•10 −4 E h α −1 (gradient). The calculations were carried out with the xtb program.…”
Section: Quantum Geometries and Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The GFN2 parametrization is less empirical than the GFN1 and it was proven to be more robust in geometry optimization. 84 The tight optimization level was used in the GFN2-xTB calculations to set the convergence thresholds to 1•10 −6 E h (energy) and 8•10 −4 E h α −1 (gradient). The calculations were carried out with the xtb program.…”
Section: Quantum Geometries and Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 7% geometries yielding the largest S q values were excluded. 84 3. Electron-count filter: Excluded all structures with an odd number of electrons.…”
Section: Quantum Geometries and Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In future practical applications, machine-learning J only makes sense if the benefit of replacing a conventional approach by ML is not marginal compared to the overall cost of obtaining molecular structures. Besides the implicit learning of molecular structures mentioned above, efficient ways of obtaining them could be the extraction from X-ray crystallographic or computational databases, or structural optimizations via cheap methods such as force-fields or tight-binding approaches [122][123][124][125][126] , or explicitly via ML models 36,127 .…”
Section: Data Set Construction and First-principles Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The xTB methods are tight-binding quantum chemical methods for the geometry optimisation of systems containing elements up to Z = 82, and represent a robust and significantly cheaper alternative to DFT for metalcontaining species. 60 A comparison of the xTB (specifically GFN2-xTB) and DFT-calculated energies of previously reported systems was undertaken (structures were taken directly from the computational workflow described below). DFT energies were obtained from single-point energy evaluations of xTB geometries using similar methods to those recently applied to related systems 25 (PBE0 61 level of theory using the Ahlrichs basis set def2-SVP, 62, 63 Grimme's D3BJ dispersion correction 64 and the polarizable continuum model (PCM) 65 implicit solvation representing DMSO; more details are available in Supporting Information Section S3).…”
Section: Semi-empirical Methods For Cage Relative Energy Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…stko provides methods to optimise metal-containing systems including the UFF4MOF forcefield 66,67 in GULP (version 5.1), 69,70 and the xtb software. 59,60 See Supporting Information Section S2 for further details. After construction with stk, the lowest energy cage conformer was found using the following sequence of optimisation steps:…”
Section: Ligand and Cage Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%