2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.08.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of water at zwitterionic copolymer film–liquid water interfaces as examined by the sum frequency generation method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, Raman and infrared spectroscopy studies have indicated that the hydrogen‐bonded network structure of water in the vicinity of zwitterionic and amphoteric polymers is not disturbed; in contrast, ordinary polyelectrolytes cause significant change to the structure of vicinal water. A similar tendency was observed for zwitterionic copolymer films, zwitterionic and amphoteric (charge‐neutralized) polymer brushes, and self‐assembled monolayers using the sum frequency generation method. Taking into account the resistance of zwitterionic and amphoteric copolymer films and polymer brushes to the non‐specific adsorption of proteins and cell adhesion, it is possible that one of the most important factors responsible for the biocompatibility of these materials is that they do not significantly alter the local structure of water.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Previously, Raman and infrared spectroscopy studies have indicated that the hydrogen‐bonded network structure of water in the vicinity of zwitterionic and amphoteric polymers is not disturbed; in contrast, ordinary polyelectrolytes cause significant change to the structure of vicinal water. A similar tendency was observed for zwitterionic copolymer films, zwitterionic and amphoteric (charge‐neutralized) polymer brushes, and self‐assembled monolayers using the sum frequency generation method. Taking into account the resistance of zwitterionic and amphoteric copolymer films and polymer brushes to the non‐specific adsorption of proteins and cell adhesion, it is possible that one of the most important factors responsible for the biocompatibility of these materials is that they do not significantly alter the local structure of water.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Conventional synthetic biocompatible polymers such as PMPC, poly(sulfobetaine methacrylate), poly(carboxybetaine methacrylate), and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) are known to demonstrate low protein adsorption and/or no platelet adhesion [3539]. PDL cells hardly adhered and proliferated on PMPC, which was consistent with the findings of a previous study by Iwasaki et al, who reported that adhesion of human promyelocytic leukemia cells and human uterine cervical cancer cells was completely suppressed on PMPC [36].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation between inert properties of polymer materials to vicinal water and their biocompatibility has previously been assessed by considering the structure of water in the vicinity of charge-neutralized and zwitterionic polymers, which was investigated using Raman, infrared, and sum frequency generation spectroscopies [39][40][41][42][43][44]. These studies suggest that the surface of amphoteric copolymers containing comparable content of MA and DMAEMA drastically suppresses both the orientation of vicinal water molecules, and the adsorption/adhesion of biomolecules such as proteins and cells [39].…”
Section: Cell Adhesionmentioning
confidence: 99%