2001
DOI: 10.1101/sqb.2001.66.57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of the Ribosome at 5.5 A Resolution and Its Interactions with Functional Ligands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It could be that each fragment binds the A site in a slightly different way, because the rest of the aa-tRNA is not present to aid in proper positioning. Although the binding of both deacylated tRNAs and CpAaa derivatives to the A site is consistent with the chemical footprinting data acquired using intact aa-tRNAs (Nissen et al 2000;Noller et al 2001), these fragments could bind in position that was only 1 or 2 Å different from the whole aatRNA. Such small differences in positioning could be sufficient to lead to different binding affinities for the fragments and would lead to the erroneous conclusion that specificity was present.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…It could be that each fragment binds the A site in a slightly different way, because the rest of the aa-tRNA is not present to aid in proper positioning. Although the binding of both deacylated tRNAs and CpAaa derivatives to the A site is consistent with the chemical footprinting data acquired using intact aa-tRNAs (Nissen et al 2000;Noller et al 2001), these fragments could bind in position that was only 1 or 2 Å different from the whole aatRNA. Such small differences in positioning could be sufficient to lead to different binding affinities for the fragments and would lead to the erroneous conclusion that specificity was present.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…The ribosome is a megadalton complex, composed of multiple proteins and RNAs, in which the activities of numerous functional centers are coordinated to synthesize proteins with great accuracy. In simple terms, the ribosome orchestrates the various stages in peptide synthesis by coordinating the activities of least nine functional centers through at least seven discrete unidirectional steps (reviewed in Noller et al 2001). Analyses of static X-ray crystal structures have been useful in localizing the functional centers at the atomic level revealing, for example, that the catalytic activity of the ribosome is mediated by RNA, and identifying the binding sites for antibiotics (reviewed in Yonath et al 1998;Noller et al 2001;Steitz and Moore 2003;Wilson and Nierhaus 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In simple terms, the ribosome orchestrates the various stages in peptide synthesis by coordinating the activities of least nine functional centers through at least seven discrete unidirectional steps (reviewed in Noller et al 2001). Analyses of static X-ray crystal structures have been useful in localizing the functional centers at the atomic level revealing, for example, that the catalytic activity of the ribosome is mediated by RNA, and identifying the binding sites for antibiotics (reviewed in Yonath et al 1998;Noller et al 2001;Steitz and Moore 2003;Wilson and Nierhaus 2003). Cryo-EM studies have supplied complementary information, providing dynamic views of intra-ribosomal movements during many of the different phases of the translation cycle (reviewed in Frank 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regions of 16S rRNA, which play a role in forming these intersubunit bridges are known in both E. coli and T. thermophilus from biochemical and crystallographic methods with many of the bridge regions shared (Chapman and Noller 1977;Noller et al 2001;Schuwirth et al 2005), therefore it is assumed for this work that subunit bridge regions are similar in all organism tested. Four helices known to be important for subunit bridge formation, helices 20, 23, 24, and 27 (helix numbers from Sykes and Williamson [2009]), show RNase T1 cleavage patterns in at least one of the organisms tested.…”
Section: Functional Regions Of 16s Rrna Are Not Appropriately Structumentioning
confidence: 99%