The x-ray diffraction structure of the non-illuminated D96A bacteriorhodopsin mutant reveals structural changes as far away as 15 Å from residue 96, at the retinal, Trp-182, Ala-215, and waters 501, 402, and 401. The Asp-to-Ala side-chain replacement breaks its hydrogen-bond with Thr-46, and the resulting separation of the cytoplasmic ends of helices B and C is communicated to the retinal region through a chain of covalent and hydrogen-bonds. The unexpected long-range consequences of the D96A mutation include breaking the hydrogen bond between O of Ala-215 and water 501, and formation of a new hydrogen-bond between water molecules 401 and 402 in the extracellular region. Because in the T46V mutant a new water molecule appears at Asp-96 and its hydrogen-bond to Ile-45 replaces Thr-46 as its link to helix B, the separation of helices B and C is smaller than in D96A and there are no atomic displacements elsewhere in the protein. Propagation of conformational changes along the chain between the retinal and Thr-46 had been observed earlier in the crystal structures of the D96N and E204Q mutants, but in the trapped M state. Consistent with perturbation of the retinal region in D96A, little change of the Thr-46 region occurs between the non-illuminated and M states of this mutant. It appears that a local perturbation can propagate along a "track" in both directions between the retinal and the Asp-96/Thr-46 pair, either from photoisomerization of the retinal in the wild-type protein in one case or from the D96A mutation in the other.Light-driven proton transport in bacteriorhodopsin is dependent on a few key residues, such as Lys-216, Asp-85, and Asp-96, and they have been identified in part from the distinctive phenotypes of mutants in which the replaced amino acids are unable, or much less able, to perform their normal roles (1-3). Other residues, such as , play more dispensable roles, as suggested by the altered but less defective phenotypes of their site-specific mutations (4-9). As usual, such assignments make the assumption that the effects of mutations are local and interpretable in terms of differences in side-chain volume, hydrogen-bonding, ability to protonate and deprotonate, etc. Of necessity, they ignore the possibility of changes distant from the site of mutation. As often acknowledged, this assumption might not be justified in all cases, and for an unambiguous interpretation of the effects of mutations structural information about the non-illuminated state, as well as the intermediates of the altered reaction cycles, would be needed.How good is the assumption of purely local perturbation in site-specific bacteriorhodopsin mutants? Crystal structures are available for several mutants, and they show that the extent of perturbation depends greatly on the residue that is exchanged, on the residue that replaced it, and on the changing local environment during the photocycle. The V49A mutation causes no structural alteration of the non-illuminated state other than the shorter side-chain (10), but the de...