1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(92)81743-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of the myosin head in solution and the effect of light chain 2 removal

Abstract: Structural properties of rabbit skeletal myosin head (S1) and the influence of the DTNB light chain (LC2) on the size and shape of myosin heads in solution were investigated by small angle x-ray scattering. The LC2 deficient myosin head, S1 (-LC2), and the S1 containing LC2 light chain, S1 (+LC2) were studied in parallel. The respective values of the radius of gyration were found to be (40.2 +/- 0.5) A and (46.7 +/- 1) A, while the maximum dimension was (190 +/- 15) A for both species. The large difference bet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we have analyzed the Rg over the same 52 range as that employed by Wakabayashi et al (1992) (s2 = 0.778-2.22 X 10-3 nm-2). As will be discussed later, this range, and to a lesser extent the somewhat lower range of S2 employed by Garrigos et al (1992), yielded an Reff(0) that is somewhat smaller than the in vacuo Rg calculated from the S1 structure (Rayment et al, 1993a). Nevertheless, the range used by Wakabayashi et al (1992) has been employed in this v work because it minimizes the effect of any residual aggregation and minimizes concentration dependence due to excluded volume effects; it also allows direct comparison with their results.…”
Section: The Rg Of Simentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here we have analyzed the Rg over the same 52 range as that employed by Wakabayashi et al (1992) (s2 = 0.778-2.22 X 10-3 nm-2). As will be discussed later, this range, and to a lesser extent the somewhat lower range of S2 employed by Garrigos et al (1992), yielded an Reff(0) that is somewhat smaller than the in vacuo Rg calculated from the S1 structure (Rayment et al, 1993a). Nevertheless, the range used by Wakabayashi et al (1992) has been employed in this v work because it minimizes the effect of any residual aggregation and minimizes concentration dependence due to excluded volume effects; it also allows direct comparison with their results.…”
Section: The Rg Of Simentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Such effects might be expected inasmuch as there have been reports (Vibert and Cohen, 1988; Rayment et al, 1993b) of possible flexibility in the light-chain binding region of S1, which consists of a long, single a-helix surrounded by the two light chains. There have been small but potentially important differences between the Rg values reported by different laboratories (Mendelson et al, 1991;Garrigos et al, 1992;Wakabayashi et al, 1992), which need to be explored before such a comparison can be meaningfully undertaken.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be achieved either by having the free portion of S2 much shorter than its full length (Bagni et al, 1990) or by having S2 attach to myosin in such a way that the projection of S2 into a plane containing actin and myosin filaments was much shorter than its true length. Indeed, such an angled attachment of Si seems a requirement of the cross-bridge model, because most recent descriptions of the dimension and attachment of the S1 head show its length to be 16-19 nm (Garrigos et al, 1992;Rayment et al, 1993), whereas the space between the surface of the actin and myosin filaments is only 12 nm at slack length. It should be noted that use of NaCl to vary saline tonicity and, hence, lattice spacing causes a sarcoplasmic ionic strength change that may also affect the magnitude of the radial force.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) The myosin heads have an elongated and slightly curved shape, with a maximal width of ca 6.0 nm and a maximal length of 17.0-18.0 nm (Garrigos et al, 1992;Wakabayashi et al, 1992;Rayment et al, 1993a). Figure 21 illustrates the behaviour of the F~ for objects of such dimensions.…”
Section: Myosin-based Meridional Reflectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%