2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnt.2018.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of the largest idempotent-product free sequences in semigroups

Abstract: Let S be a finite semigroup, and let E(S) be the set of all idempotents of S. Gillam, Hall and Williams proved in 1972 that every S-valued sequence T of length at least |S| − |E(S)|+1 is not (strongly) idempotent-product free, in the sense that it contains a nonempty subsequence the product of whose terms, in their natural order in T , is an idempotent, which affirmed a question of Erdős. They also showed that the value |S| − |E(S)| + 1 is best possible.Here, motivated by Gillam, Hall and Williams' work, we de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The connection between the Erdős-Burgess and Davenport constants first appeared in a recent paper of Wang [18] on maximal sequences over semigroups that avoid idempotent products. When S is a finite abelian group, for instance, the identity is the only idempotent element, so I(S) = D(S) trivially.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connection between the Erdős-Burgess and Davenport constants first appeared in a recent paper of Wang [18] on maximal sequences over semigroups that avoid idempotent products. When S is a finite abelian group, for instance, the identity is the only idempotent element, so I(S) = D(S) trivially.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hall and N.H. Williams [10] proved that a sequence T over any finite semigroup S of length at least |S \ E(S)| + 1 must contain one or more terms whose product, in the order induced from the sequence T , is an idempotent, and therefore, completely answered the Erdős' question. The Gillam-Hall-Williams Theorem was extended to infinite semigroups by the author [17] in 2019. It was also remarked that although the bound |S \ E(S)| + 1 is optimal for general semigroups S, that better bound can be obtained, at least in principle, for specific classes of semigroups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definition A. ( [17], Definition 4.1) For a commutative semigroup S, define the Erdős-Burgess constant of S, denoted I(S), to be the least ℓ ∈ N ∪ {∞} such that every sequence T of terms from S and of length ℓ must contain one or more terms such that their product is an idempotent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hall and N.H. Williams [10] proved that a sequence T over any finite semigroup S of length at least |S \ E(S)| + 1 must contain one or more terms whose product, in the order induced from the sequence T , is an idempotent, and therefore, completely answered Erdős' question. The Gillam-Hall-Williams Theorem was extended to infinite semigroups by the author [19]. It was also remarked that the bound |S \ E(S)| + 1, although is optimal for general semigroups S, can be improved, at least in principle, for specific classed of semigroups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%