1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62115-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of the Insect Head in Ontogeny and Phylogeny: A View from Drosophila

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
71
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 215 publications
6
71
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mouthpart elements from the maxillary and labial regions are developmentally available for co-optation and modification into compound tubular structures, such as the siphon (Handschin, 1929;Eastham & Eassa, 1955;Nagatomi & Soroida, 1985), often with anatomical contribution from adjacent mouthpart regions (Krenn et al, 2005). Siphonate proboscis formation undoubtedly is a recurring process and occurs, perhaps in a genetically and developmentally homologous way, in the conversion of mandibulate mouthparts into piercing-and-sucking haustellate mouthparts in nonholometabolous Hemiptera (Rogers & Kaufman, 1997).…”
Section: Mid Mesozoic Long-proboscid Insects and Their Seed Plant Hostsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mouthpart elements from the maxillary and labial regions are developmentally available for co-optation and modification into compound tubular structures, such as the siphon (Handschin, 1929;Eastham & Eassa, 1955;Nagatomi & Soroida, 1985), often with anatomical contribution from adjacent mouthpart regions (Krenn et al, 2005). Siphonate proboscis formation undoubtedly is a recurring process and occurs, perhaps in a genetically and developmentally homologous way, in the conversion of mandibulate mouthparts into piercing-and-sucking haustellate mouthparts in nonholometabolous Hemiptera (Rogers & Kaufman, 1997).…”
Section: Mid Mesozoic Long-proboscid Insects and Their Seed Plant Hostsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previously published Oncopeltus proboscipedia (Of'pb) sequence (Rogers and Kaufman, 1997) was used to design primers for 3′ RACE which allowed us to isolate a large cDNA (approximately 3 kb) corresponding to the 3′ end of the transcript. The Oncopeltus Ultrabithorax (Of'Ubx) and initial abdominal-A (Of'abd-A) had not been isolated so we cloned fragments of these genes using degenerate primers designed to the conserved homeodomain, and isolated larger fragments using exact primers.…”
Section: Cloningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1)-has been viewed as distinct from that just described. (10) A different suite of gap genes under maternal control, including orthodenticle, empty spiracles and buttonhead, was thought to cooperate in directly driving a pattern of segment-polarity gene expression similar, but not identical, to that seen in the trunk. (10,11) There was no evidence of genes Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%