1980
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0981(80)90151-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of phytal harpacticoid copepod assemblages and the influence of habitat complexity and turbidity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
112
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
6
112
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the presence of epiphytes can increase the habitat complexity, making it more attractive as providing food resources indirectly, making environments available for the development of the periphyton and favoring the accumulation of sediments (Hicks, 1980). Taking into account that the diet of some species of the genera Ampithoe and Cymadusa includes microalgae (Brawley & Adey, 1981;Norton & Benson, 1983) and detritus (Zimmerman et al, 1979), it would be possible that these amphipods are indirectly related to epiphytic algae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the presence of epiphytes can increase the habitat complexity, making it more attractive as providing food resources indirectly, making environments available for the development of the periphyton and favoring the accumulation of sediments (Hicks, 1980). Taking into account that the diet of some species of the genera Ampithoe and Cymadusa includes microalgae (Brawley & Adey, 1981;Norton & Benson, 1983) and detritus (Zimmerman et al, 1979), it would be possible that these amphipods are indirectly related to epiphytic algae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next to oxygen, other physico-chemical aspects were altered inside the macrophytodetritus accumulation. Meiofauna are not known to directly assimilate dissolved nutrients (Mitwally and Fleeger, 2013;Siebers, 1982), but physico-chemical fluctuations influence their potential food sources (Atilla et al, 2005;Hall and Bell, 1988;Hicks, 1977Hicks, , 1980. Therefore, nutrient fluctuations would also presumably impact meiofauna indirectly by altering the habitat structure .…”
Section: Environmental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These accumulations thereby support high values of secondary production in the receiving communities (Vetter 1995;Mateo and Romero 1997). The structurally complex macrophytodetritus accumulations seem to facilitate the development of meiofaunal communities in coastal marshes (Sanmarti and Menendez 2007), mangrove forests (Torres-Pratts and Schizas 2007) and seagrass beds (Hicks 1980;Coull and Wells 1983;Mascart et al 2013). In terms of copepod community, connectivity between these accumulation and other adjacent habitats (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%