1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1693(00)86805-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of hexafluorotetrapyridine dimolybdenum(III)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…234 Reaction of molybdenum or tungsten hydrides with HBF 4 has also led to some fluoro complexes, [W(PMe 3 ) 4 H 2 F 2 ], [W(PMe 3 ) 4 H 2 F(HF 2 )], [Mo(PMe 3 ) 4 H 2 F(HF 2 )], [{MoH 2 (PMe 2 Ph) 3 } 2 -(m-F) 3 ][BF 4 ] and [W(PMe 3 ) 4 H 2 F 2 (H 2 O)]. 235-239 Other fluoro-species include a rare example with a thioether ligand, [MoF(S)([16]aneS 4 )]-[BF 4 ], 240 [{Mo(MeCN) 4 O} 2 (m-F)][BF 4 ] 2 , 241 [MoOF(RNC) 4 ][BF 4 ], 242 and [Mo 2 F 6 (py) 4 ] 243.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…234 Reaction of molybdenum or tungsten hydrides with HBF 4 has also led to some fluoro complexes, [W(PMe 3 ) 4 H 2 F 2 ], [W(PMe 3 ) 4 H 2 F(HF 2 )], [Mo(PMe 3 ) 4 H 2 F(HF 2 )], [{MoH 2 (PMe 2 Ph) 3 } 2 -(m-F) 3 ][BF 4 ] and [W(PMe 3 ) 4 H 2 F 2 (H 2 O)]. 235-239 Other fluoro-species include a rare example with a thioether ligand, [MoF(S)([16]aneS 4 )]-[BF 4 ], 240 [{Mo(MeCN) 4 O} 2 (m-F)][BF 4 ] 2 , 241 [MoOF(RNC) 4 ][BF 4 ], 242 and [Mo 2 F 6 (py) 4 ] 243.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar coordination motifs have been previously observed for [Zr 2 F 12 ] 4– in [Co­((NH 2 ) 2 C 2 H 4 ) 3 ] 2 [Zr 2 F 12 ]­[SiF 6 ]·4H 2 O and for [MF 4 (OS­(CH 3 ) 2 ) 2 ] 2 (M = Zr, Hf). , Although the Mo–Mo distance [exptl 3.4981(3); calcd 3.518 Å] is much smaller than the sum of the van der Waals radii [ R vdW (Mo) = 2.1 Å], the bond angles of the four-membered ring [F b –Mo–F b , exptl 65.21(5)°, calcd 65.2°; Mo–F b –Mo, exptl 114.79(5)°, calcd 114.8°], the low Wiberg bond index (WBI = 0.01), and the negligible (3.3 kJ mol –1 ) donor–acceptor interaction, as determined by second-order perturbation theory of the natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis, collectively indicate that no significant bonding character is present between the Mo centers. Conversely, an appreciably smaller Mo–Mo distance [2.533(1) Å] is observed in the octahedral Mo III complex [MoF 3 (NC 5 H 5 ) 2 ] 2 , which thus contains a substantial bonding interaction . MoF 5 (NC 5 H 5 ) 2 , [MoF 5 (NC 5 H 5 )] 2 , and MoOF 4 (NC 5 H 5 ) 2 represent the first neutral adducts of MoF 5 and the first heptacoordinate adduct of MoOF 4 , respectively, to be conclusively characterized.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 In 2, the Re−Re′ bond distance (2.2575(2) Å) is ∼0.02 Å shorter than in Re 2 (ArNCHNAr) 4 Cl 2 (Ar = CH 3 C 6 H 5 (2.2759(3) Å), 7 p-OMe (2.2777(3) Å), m-OMe (2.2765(6) Å), 3,4-Cl 2 (2.2783(4) Å), 3,5-Cl 2 (2.2734(3) Å)). 13 The Re−Re distance of Re 2 (dpf) 4 F 2 (2) is longer than in Re 2 (hpp) 4 F 2 (1), and this elongation is well reflected by a stronger interaction of the axial fluoride ligand (Table 1). The Re−F ax bond length (i.e., 2.059(1) Å) is ∼0.1 Å shorter than in 1.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metal–metal bond chemistry of group 6–8 transition-metal complexes containing fluoride ligands is poorly developed, and only six complexes have been reported: Mo 2 F 6 (py) 4 , Mo 2 F 4 (PMe 3 ) 4 , ( n- Bu 4 N) 2 [Re 2 F 8 ], Re 2 (hpp) 4 F 2 , [Re 2 (hpp) 4 F]­(TFPB) 2 , and Ru 2 (ap) 4 F . One reason is the lack of availability of metal–metal bonded fluoro precursors which can be easily obtained in high yield.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%