2001
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.64.061405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of ferrofluid dynamics

Abstract: The complete magnetodissipative structure of ferrofluid dynamics is derived from general principles, without reference to the angular momentum of the ferromagnetic grains. The results are independent of most microscopic details, and easily interpret two previous experiments. Both the Debye theory and the effective-field theory by Shliomis are shown to be special cases of the new set of equations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
163
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
163
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiments [22,23,24] show that any nonzero strength of the magnetic field influences the thermodiffusive processes. Thus the general ansatz for the dissipative mass flux is (following the notation in [9])…”
Section: Ferrofluid Dynamics: Chemical Potential and Mass Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The experiments [22,23,24] show that any nonzero strength of the magnetic field influences the thermodiffusive processes. Thus the general ansatz for the dissipative mass flux is (following the notation in [9])…”
Section: Ferrofluid Dynamics: Chemical Potential and Mass Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal structure of the ferrofluid dynamics theory was given in [9]. It is based firstly on general principles as symmetry considerations and conservations laws and on irreversible thermodynamics.…”
Section: Ferrofluid Dynamics: Chemical Potential and Mass Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the last few years many theoretical studies have been performed with the aim of describing these effects. Some theoretical models explain the effects on the basis of microscopic assumptions [2,3], while others are based on a mesoscale or macroscopic level [4,5]. The models lead to different predictions and open up new questions; one point which has to be clarified is the question of an appearance of a magnetic field dependent yield stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%