1990
DOI: 10.1107/s0108270189009480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of diethyl 4-ethoxycarbonyl-3,4-dihydrobenzo[ f ]quinoline-3-phosphonate

Abstract: C2oH24NO5P, Mr=389"40, monoclinic, P2~/a, a = 15.332 (3), b = 10-603 (6), 3 c= 12.442 (6) ,h,, fl = 100.89 (3) °, V = 1986 (1) A, Z = 4, Dx=l.30gcm -3, MoKa, A=0"7107A, /z = 1.84cm -~, F(000)= 824, room temperature, R= 0.059 for 2108 observed reflections [Fo > 3or(Fo)]. Out of l l C---C bonds of the biphenyl ring, four bonds (1-35-1-38 A) are significantly shorter than the others * Present address: (1-40-1.43 A). Two P--O single bonds are 1.564 (4) and 1-560 (4)/~ in length, and the P--O double-bond length is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean PÐ O single-bond distance of 1.565 (3) A Ê for (I) and (II) is in agreement with the reported value of 1.564 (5) A Ê for the structure of diethyl (1-hydroxy-2-butynyl)phosphonate (Sanders et al, 1996). The P1 O1 double-bond distances in (I) and (II) are comparable with the reported values of 1.464 (2), 1.459 (3) and 1.454 (4) A Ê [Naidu et al (1992), Boehlow et al (1997) and Yokota et al (1990), respectively]. The P1ÐC15 single-bond lengths in both compounds are in good agreement with reported values of 1.791 (2) and 1.806 (6) A Ê (Weichsel & Lis, 1996;Liu et al, 1995;Perales & Garcõ Âa-Blanco, 1977;Howells et al, 1973).…”
Section: Commentsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The mean PÐ O single-bond distance of 1.565 (3) A Ê for (I) and (II) is in agreement with the reported value of 1.564 (5) A Ê for the structure of diethyl (1-hydroxy-2-butynyl)phosphonate (Sanders et al, 1996). The P1 O1 double-bond distances in (I) and (II) are comparable with the reported values of 1.464 (2), 1.459 (3) and 1.454 (4) A Ê [Naidu et al (1992), Boehlow et al (1997) and Yokota et al (1990), respectively]. The P1ÐC15 single-bond lengths in both compounds are in good agreement with reported values of 1.791 (2) and 1.806 (6) A Ê (Weichsel & Lis, 1996;Liu et al, 1995;Perales & Garcõ Âa-Blanco, 1977;Howells et al, 1973).…”
Section: Commentsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This was the first example of a six-membered ring formationvia carbonyl oxygen coordination. Earlier work was concentrated on the formation of phosphorus compounds containing four- and five-membered cyclic systems showing oxygen coordination.
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent literature on carbonyl donor action has demonstrated the formation of four- 19-21 and five-membered 22-24 ring systems. With the inclusion of OR groups, a wider variety of donor−acceptor interactions is known giving similar size rings. , Some examples are shown in Chart , which includes three examples with potential for donor−acceptor interactions but whose X-ray structures give excessively long P−O distances. Of the ones that form small-membered ring systems, they are by necessity rigid compared to that for the conformationally more flexible six-membered cyclic systems employed in the present study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S0020 With the inclusion of OR groups, a wider variety of donoracceptor interactions is known giving similar size rings. 21,[25][26][27][28][29][30] Some examples are shown in Chart 2, which includes three examples [31][32][33] with potential for donor-acceptor interactions but whose X-ray structures give excessively long P-O distances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%