1987
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90289-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of cryptic λ prophages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strain BC200 was thought to be deleted for a defective prophage, but map analysis showed it to carry instead an inverted duplication of 45 kb. Strain BC200 was selected as a UV-resistant survivor after a high dose of UV (2), and its duplication may be similar to those seen in cryptic lysogens of E. coli, which arise when lambda lysogens are given high doses of UV (38). We do not know whether the putative prophage genome has been interrupted or deleted by this duplication or whether the lack of prophage expression results from undetectable changes elsewhere in the genome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strain BC200 was thought to be deleted for a defective prophage, but map analysis showed it to carry instead an inverted duplication of 45 kb. Strain BC200 was selected as a UV-resistant survivor after a high dose of UV (2), and its duplication may be similar to those seen in cryptic lysogens of E. coli, which arise when lambda lysogens are given high doses of UV (38). We do not know whether the putative prophage genome has been interrupted or deleted by this duplication or whether the lack of prophage expression results from undetectable changes elsewhere in the genome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hybridization data presented in Fig. 3B demonstrate that the mutations resulted from the substitution of the QSR-cos region of phage A by the functional QSR'-cos region from Qsr' cryptic phage (11,24,37 [8] and Becker and Murialdo [2]). We infected wild-type and mutant hosts with the lysis-defective variant, AcI857Sam7, and monitored this cleavage reaction (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is likely to be the product of multiple events involving the repeated site-specific integration of prophages, perhaps followed by their stabilization in the host genome by recombination with other resident prophages. Events such as the latter may lead to the stable duplication of genes and may account for the fact that a second copy of the sopE virulence determinant resides within SPI7 (52). Consistent with this idea, SPI7, when it is found in isolates of S. enterica serovar Paratyphi C, appears to lack the sopE gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%