1992
DOI: 10.1016/0749-6419(92)90049-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of constitutive equations in plasticity for different choices of state and control variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As demonstrated by Klisinski et al [1], the choice of state variables in which the yield surface is represented does not a ect the structure of the constitutive equations. Thus, the predominantly adopted stress space representation is used throughout this paper.…”
Section: Yield and Plastic Owmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As demonstrated by Klisinski et al [1], the choice of state variables in which the yield surface is represented does not a ect the structure of the constitutive equations. Thus, the predominantly adopted stress space representation is used throughout this paper.…”
Section: Yield and Plastic Owmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…whereas A : U = A : U = 0 [1]. Assume now that U and A are the control variables, i.e., those which are prescribed.…”
Section: Stress and Strain Control Splitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, it can be 16 proved that for elastoplastic strain-hardening models controllability conditions can be evaluated 17 from a critical value of the hardening modulus, H (Klisinski et al, 1992;Buscarnera et al, 2011). 18…”
Section: Modelling Approach For Flow Slide Triggering 8mentioning
confidence: 99%