2011
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m111.261909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of Collagen Receptor Integrin α1I Domain Carrying the Activating Mutation E317A

Abstract: Background:The integrin ␣I domain undergoes a conformational change during activation. Results: The crystal structure of an activated ␣I domain is different from the reported open and closed states. Conclusion: Our structure mimics the state where the Arg 287 -Glu 317 ion pair is just broken during the activation process. Significance: The activation mechanism of the collagen receptor integrins differs from the other integrins.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(75 reference statements)
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was surprising, because both Mg 2ϩ and Mn 2ϩ support binding of collagen IV to ␣1␤1 at these concentrations (42,58), and crystallographic data on integrin I domains support the concept that Mg 2ϩ -and Mn 2ϩ -bound I domains form essentially identical structures (65). These data, in conjunction with the recently reported crystal structure of ␣1I with the activating mutation E317A (32), led us to propose a model for collagenbinding integrin I domain activation that provides a structural basis for the enhanced activating ability of Mn 2ϩ and the inability of Ca 2ϩ to mediate ligand binding (Fig. 9).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result was surprising, because both Mg 2ϩ and Mn 2ϩ support binding of collagen IV to ␣1␤1 at these concentrations (42,58), and crystallographic data on integrin I domains support the concept that Mg 2ϩ -and Mn 2ϩ -bound I domains form essentially identical structures (65). These data, in conjunction with the recently reported crystal structure of ␣1I with the activating mutation E317A (32), led us to propose a model for collagenbinding integrin I domain activation that provides a structural basis for the enhanced activating ability of Mn 2ϩ and the inability of Ca 2ϩ to mediate ligand binding (Fig. 9).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Collagen ligand binding leads to conversion back to the more stable hexa-coordinate geometry and induces allosteric changes in the C-terminal helices. Importantly, Mg 2ϩ ions pay a significant energetic penalty for deviating from a hexacoordinate (octahedral) geometry, whereas Mn 2ϩ is capable of adopting lower coordination states (32). Thus, Mn 2ϩ , with a lower energetic barrier to adopting the activated conformation, is more effective at driving the opening of the ␣C helix and enabling ligand binding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 is consistent with a significant shift difference between helix ␣7 and associated global structural changes toward open conformation (12). It is surprising, therefore, that this helix was unperturbed in a recent crystal structure of the ␣1 I domain containing a double C139S/E317A substitution (32). This inconsistency may be due to the different experimental conditions used in the NMR and crystallization experiments and the fact that the crystal lattice may impose a constraint that favors a conformation that is likely to be only one of multiple interconverting conformations present under solution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…On the other hand, mutation of the Thr 221 in the ␣2 I domain results in loss of adhesion to collagen I in the isolated ␣2 I domain as well as when it is expressed in the full-length integrin ␣2 subunit (34). Finally, the E317A substitution in the ␣1 I domain results in a domain with increased binding to both collagens I and IV, an effect that is maintained when the same mutation is expressed in the whole integrin ␣1 subunit in cells (32). Thus, it is clear that not all mutations that alter the binding of the ␣1 I domain to its natural ligand result in the same changes in the context of the whole integrin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%