2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-79852-3_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of Classical Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we take a different approach, studying all the invariants, and treating the problem using the methods of invariant theory [16][17][18], which considers the ring of polynomials that are invariant under the action of a group. Polynomial invariants also are the relevant objects for physics applications, since an effective Lagrangian is written as a polynomial in the basic variables which describe the theory.…”
Section: Jhep10(2009)094mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, we take a different approach, studying all the invariants, and treating the problem using the methods of invariant theory [16][17][18], which considers the ring of polynomials that are invariant under the action of a group. Polynomial invariants also are the relevant objects for physics applications, since an effective Lagrangian is written as a polynomial in the basic variables which describe the theory.…”
Section: Jhep10(2009)094mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the invariants, it is useful to introduce several mathematical results from invariant theory [16][17][18]. The general problem is the following: one has a set of variables x 1 , .…”
Section: Jhep10(2009)094mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially by Schur's lemma (cf. [14], Section 3.3) each W i is then an H-representation space and the action of G × H on V is given by…”
Section: Commuting Group Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that (G : V ) is one of the cases (1) to (10) in the table of Appendix A. We may assume here that G = GC, C ∼ = C * .…”
Section: Application To D-modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As observed above the category mod θ (U ) has a nice combinatorial description, which would give, when G is simply connected, a classification of the regular holonomic modules on V whose characteristic variety is contained inC(V ). (SO(n) × C * : C n ) 2 (s + 1)(s + n/2) yes yes (2) (GL(n) : S 2 C n ) n n i=1 (s + (i + 1)/2) yes yes (3) (GL(n) : 2 C n ), n even n/2 n/2 i=1 (s + 2i − 1) yes yes (4) (GL(n) × SL(n) : M n (C)) n n i=1 (s + i) yes yes (5) (Sp(n) × GL(2) : M 2n,2 (C)) 2 (s + 1)(s + 2n) yes no (6) (SO(7) × C * : spin = C 8 ) 2 (s + 1)(s + 4) yes no (7) (SO(9) × C * : spin = C 16 ) 2 (s + 1)(s + 8) no no (8) (G 2 × C * : C 7 ) 2 (s + 1)(s + 7/2) yes no (9) (E 6 × C * : C 27 ) 3 (s + 1)(s + 5)(s + 9) no yes (10) (GL(4) × Sp(2) : M 4 (C)) 4 (s + 1)(s + 2)(s + 3)(s + 4) yes yes (3') (GL(n) : 2 C n ), n odd --yes no (4') (GL(n) × SL(m) : M n,m (C)), n = m --yes no (11) (Sp(n) × GL(1) : C 2n ) --yes no (12) (Sp(n) × GL(3) : M 2n,3 (C)) --no no (10') (GL(n) × Sp(2) : M n,4 (C)), n = 4 --yes no (13) (SO(10) × C * : 1 2 spin = C 16 ) --yes no…”
Section: Regular Holonomic Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%