2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2008.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of Ahmic domain and its vicinity, southwestern Central Gneiss Belt, Grenville Province of Ontario (Canada)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3), was previously interpreted as a product of superimposed deformation (Schwerdtner 1987(Schwerdtner , 1988Gower 1992), but an alternative possibility, not considered in the earlier studies, is that it developed after the metamorphic peak during regional buckling under conditions of ductile transtension (e.g., Dewey et al 1998). Such an interpretation is attractive because it has been known for some time that buckling played a major role in the formation of some km-scale cross-folds, especially those that deform the domain boundaries in the lower parts of the CGB thrust-sheet stack (Schwerdtner 1988;Schwerdtner and van Berkel 1991;Schwerdtner and Klemens 2008). Irrespective of their origin, it is important to note that km-scale cross-folds are absent from the walls of the CAB boundary (formerly Central Metasedimentary Belt boundary; Ontario Geological Survey 1992; Schwerdtner et al 2010b), suggesting that cross-folding was confined to the lower portion of the earlyOttawan thrust-sheet stack.…”
Section: Late-stage Cross-folds and L-s Shape Fabricsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…3), was previously interpreted as a product of superimposed deformation (Schwerdtner 1987(Schwerdtner , 1988Gower 1992), but an alternative possibility, not considered in the earlier studies, is that it developed after the metamorphic peak during regional buckling under conditions of ductile transtension (e.g., Dewey et al 1998). Such an interpretation is attractive because it has been known for some time that buckling played a major role in the formation of some km-scale cross-folds, especially those that deform the domain boundaries in the lower parts of the CGB thrust-sheet stack (Schwerdtner 1988;Schwerdtner and van Berkel 1991;Schwerdtner and Klemens 2008). Irrespective of their origin, it is important to note that km-scale cross-folds are absent from the walls of the CAB boundary (formerly Central Metasedimentary Belt boundary; Ontario Geological Survey 1992; Schwerdtner et al 2010b), suggesting that cross-folding was confined to the lower portion of the earlyOttawan thrust-sheet stack.…”
Section: Late-stage Cross-folds and L-s Shape Fabricsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…3), in which mesoscopic boudinage of amphibolite dikes was associated with migmatization and occurred under peak metamorphic conditions at ca. 1080 Ma, implying boudinage took place during thrusting at mid-crustal levels (Bussy et al 1995;Klemens 1996;Schwerdtner and Klemens 2008). On this basis, mesoscopic boudins in peak assemblages elsewhere in the CGB, locally with wide gaps attesting to >500% bulk extension of competent layers, are also inferred to have formed at mid-crustal levels.…”
Section: Mesoscopic Boudins Mineral-elongation Lineation and Cross-mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations