1980
DOI: 10.1107/s0567740880004803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of acetylcholine tetraphenylborate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They located four of the five conformations we located, namely the gg, gt, tg, and tt conformations. Despite the flexibility of ACh expected from the gas-phase studies, solution NMR studies indicate that the gt form is preponderant in aqueous solution, and X-ray diffraction studies indicate that the gt and gg forms are preponderant in crystals of acetylcholine salts. In fact for acetylcholine chloride, the cation retains the gt conformation in the crystal, in the semirigid clathrate structures of the small hydrates (up to seven water molecules), and in dilute solution .…”
Section: Results and Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They located four of the five conformations we located, namely the gg, gt, tg, and tt conformations. Despite the flexibility of ACh expected from the gas-phase studies, solution NMR studies indicate that the gt form is preponderant in aqueous solution, and X-ray diffraction studies indicate that the gt and gg forms are preponderant in crystals of acetylcholine salts. In fact for acetylcholine chloride, the cation retains the gt conformation in the crystal, in the semirigid clathrate structures of the small hydrates (up to seven water molecules), and in dilute solution .…”
Section: Results and Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within a particular set of complexes the displacements are largest for the bridged structures. Nevertheless, the range of calculated dihedral angles is only 5° wider than the range observed experimentally. ,, The data for all of the complexes have been tabulated and supplied as Supporting Information (Table S2).…”
Section: Results and Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For nicotine, cytisine and eserine, which are relatively rigid molecules, the X‐ray structures at highest resolution were considered (Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) entries DOXSIS ( Barlow et al , 1986 ), FITPIHO2 (Barlow & Johnson, 1989) and ESEIN10 (Pauling & Petcher, 1973), respectively). In contrast, for ACh and muscarine, which are more flexible molecules, all X‐ray structures were considered (CSD entries ACHOLC (Herdklotz & Sass, 1970), ACCHOBII (Svinning & Sourum, 1975), ACHTPB ( Datta et al , 1980 ) and GEBMEF ( Frydenvang et al , 1988 ) for ACh; HABNON (Frydenvang, 1990) and HABNUT (Frydenvang, 1990) for muscarine). The basic nitrogens were assumed to have a positively charged protonated form.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the interactions of biologically interesting molecules, it is necessary to know the shape of the interaction sites as well as the conformations of the interacting molecules and, the conformational analysis of Ach has been subject of many experimental 6–25 and theoretical 26–46 investigations. Aspects of the Ach potential energy surface (PES) have been the subject of numerous experimental investigations including X‐Ray 6–8, 16–21, NMR 9, 11–14, 23, 25, electron diffraction 22, and Raman Spectroscopy 15, in addition, computational studies have employed ab initio 3, 31, 34, 35, 42–44, semi empirical and empirical methods 26–30, 38, 39 as well as molecular dynamics 36, 37, 45.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%