2020
DOI: 10.1002/ange.201915465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of a Protein–RNA Complex by Solid‐State NMR Spectroscopy

Abstract: Solid‐state NMR (ssNMR) is applicable to high molecular‐weight (MW) protein assemblies in a non‐amorphous precipitate. The technique yields atomic resolution structural information on both soluble and insoluble particles without limitations of MW or requirement of crystals. Herein, we propose and demonstrate an approach that yields the structure of protein–RNA complexes (RNP) solely from ssNMR data. Instead of using low‐sensitivity magnetization transfer steps between heteronuclei of the protein and the RNA, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two tags were chosen in order to compare and contrast their applicability for protein solid-state NMR studies. The diamagnetic reference for the PROXYL-M-tagged protein was obtained by reducing PROXYL-M with ascorbic acid after tagging of DnaB [22]. In case of the DOTA-M tag, the paramagnetic protein sample was prepared by using Gd 3+ , whereas the diamagnetic reference state was obtained by using Lu 3+ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The two tags were chosen in order to compare and contrast their applicability for protein solid-state NMR studies. The diamagnetic reference for the PROXYL-M-tagged protein was obtained by reducing PROXYL-M with ascorbic acid after tagging of DnaB [22]. In case of the DOTA-M tag, the paramagnetic protein sample was prepared by using Gd 3+ , whereas the diamagnetic reference state was obtained by using Lu 3+ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spin labeling rection with PROXYL-M was performed at 4 °C and pH 7.5 for 18 h using a protein concentration of 110 µM and a 30-fold excess of spin label (per cysteine). The reduction of the PROXYL-M tag was performed in a new buffer (10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM NaCl, 30 mM ascorbic acid, 10% glycerine, pH 7.5) [22]. Finally, the solution was desalted with PD-10 column.…”
Section: Tagging Of Dnab With the Reduced Form Of Proxyl-mmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… A) Depiction of the L7Ae‐wt+RNA complex (ssNMR structure PDB ID: 6TPH) [29b] . Color code: gray: L7Ae protein (residues I93 and V95 in dark gray, with their methyl carbons in purple and pink, respectively), light brown: RNA backbone, red: A, green: G, blue: C, yellow: U.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structures of protein-RNA complexes are also prevalent, and were determined using various techniques such as cryogenic electron microscopy (CryoEM) (7), X-ray (8) and solution NMR (9). Solid state NMR has also provided structures of isolated RNA molecules or in complex with proteins (10, 11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%