2016
DOI: 10.7554/elife.14313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of a Holliday junction complex reveals mechanisms governing a highly regulated DNA transaction

Abstract: The molecular machinery responsible for DNA expression, recombination, and compaction has been difficult to visualize as functionally complete entities due to their combinatorial and structural complexity. We report here the structure of the intact functional assembly responsible for regulating and executing a site-specific DNA recombination reaction. The assembly is a 240-bp Holliday junction (HJ) bound specifically by 11 protein subunits. This higher-order complex is a key intermediate in the tightly regulat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DNase I footprints of Apl at its binding sites at pR-pL and at att P are indicative of Apl binding on the inside face of bent DNA ( 17 ). Our results and previous studies establish a number of features of Apl DNA binding, many or all of which are shared with other well-studied RDFs ( 1–2 , 5 , 9 , 12–14 , 20 , 41 ): (i) the operators are arranged as direct repeats, spaced roughly one turn of the DNA helix apart, presumably with one monomer bound per operator; (ii) binding to a single specific operator is weak; (iii) binding to adjacent operators is highly cooperative; (iv) binding causes DNA bending; and (v) the difference in affinity for specific and non-specific sites is small, presumably reflecting flexible sequence recognition. The presence of these features in Apl supports the idea that this basic mode of DNA binding is universal in this group of proteins ( 13 , 14 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DNase I footprints of Apl at its binding sites at pR-pL and at att P are indicative of Apl binding on the inside face of bent DNA ( 17 ). Our results and previous studies establish a number of features of Apl DNA binding, many or all of which are shared with other well-studied RDFs ( 1–2 , 5 , 9 , 12–14 , 20 , 41 ): (i) the operators are arranged as direct repeats, spaced roughly one turn of the DNA helix apart, presumably with one monomer bound per operator; (ii) binding to a single specific operator is weak; (iii) binding to adjacent operators is highly cooperative; (iv) binding causes DNA bending; and (v) the difference in affinity for specific and non-specific sites is small, presumably reflecting flexible sequence recognition. The presence of these features in Apl supports the idea that this basic mode of DNA binding is universal in this group of proteins ( 13 , 14 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Where examined, RDFs have been shown to cause large bends in attachment site ( att ) DNA (λ Xis ( 7–9 ), P2 Cox ( 10 ), L5 Xis ( 11 ), P4 Vis ( 12 ), Wϕ Cox ( 10 ), P22 Xis ( 13 ) and Pukovnik Xis ( 5 )). A cryo-EM structure of the Holliday junction intermediate of the λ excisive complex ( 9 ) revealed three key roles for λ Xis in formation of the complex, including promoting integrase (Int) binding, mediating an Xis/Int interface, and bending of att DNA to position the DNA for cooperative Int binding. A crystal structure of λ Xis, showed three Xis monomers bound to the X1-X1.5-X2 sites in att R causing a 72° non-planar bend in the DNA, leading to the hypothesis that a twisted microfilament forms ( 14 ), a hypothesis supported by DNA compaction studies on P2 Cox ( 15 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role played by IHF also represents a surprising variation on a feature sometimes seen in transposases. In both λ and μ phage mobilization pathways, IHF, or the related protein HU, are involved in bringing recognition sequences on the viral DNA into contact with the integrase (29, 30). Notably, in the phage pathways, IHF aids in the recognition of donor DNA, while in CRISPR acquisition it is important for recognition of the target DNA, highlighting the shift in substrate selectivity from donor to target that was essential for the “domestication” of Cas1 for use in immunity (25, 26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling of this intasome shows that, while the IHF-H' complex might need to flex slightly to allow synergetic binding of two domains of integrase to DNA 31 sequences flanking it, it can remain static throughout the integration reaction. 58 However, in the fully bent form of the IHF-H1 complex, the flanking DNA and the copy of integrase bound to it block incorporation of the bacterial attB DNA segment. Significant flexing of the H1-induced DNA bend as shown in Figure 9 is therefore required for its biological function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%