Structure of a dynamic simulation model for beef cattle production systems

Abstract

. 1999. Stucture of a dynamic simulation model for beef cattle production systems. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 79: [409][410][411][412][413][414][415][416][417]. A dynamic deterministic model for simulating beef cattle production systems is developed to evaluate the effects of production traits and management strategies on the bioeconomic efficiency of beef production systems. The model, named Alberta Beef Production Simulation System (ABPSS), is composed of four major submodels: herd inventory, nutrient requirement, forage production, and economic submodels. The herd inventory submodel is used to simulate population dynamics and feed requirements in the herd. The nutrient requirements submodel is mainly based on the 1996 version of the National Research Council (NRC). It is used to evaluate nutrients and feed requirements for calves and cows depending on their physiological status (maintenance, growth, lactation and gestation) and the climatic condition. The forage production submodel is used to predict forage growth rate, cattle grazing rate, available forage biomass and total hectares required for grazing. The economic submodel measures bioeconomic efficiency, as net return per cow, by subtracting total cost from total return. The nutrient requirements predicted by ABPSS were compared with those recommended by the NRC for testing. The results that were predicted by the NRC model and ABPSS model were similar, as expected. Sensitivity analyses showed that cow mature weight, milk production, calf weaning weight and feed prices were the most critical input parameters in the model. It must be noted that the model was developed based on available experimental results and data from the literature and, due to the unavailability of a suitable data set, the model could not be validated. We suggest that the ABPSS has the potential for providing a useful method for simultaneous consideration of many factors in an integrated system, which could be helpful to beef cattle extension specialists and cow-calf production managers for assessing the potential effects of different management and selection strategies on bioeconomic efficiency. Key words:Beef cattle, simulation and modelling, production system, optimization Pang, H., Makarechian, M., Basarab, J. A. et Berg, R. T. 1999. Structure d'un modèle en simulation dynamique applicable aux systèmes de production de bovins à viande. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 79: 409-417. Nous avons mis au point un modèle déter-ministe dynamique de simulation des systèmes de production de bovins à viande, pour évaluer les effets des caractères de production et les protocoles de gestion sur l'efficience bioéconomique de ces systèmes. Désigné par le nom de «Alberta Beef Production Simulation System» (ABPSS), il comprend quatre grandes composantes : inventaire du troupeau, besoins en nutriments, production fourragère et économie. La première composante est utilisée pour simuler l'évolution des effectifs et les besoins en aliments du troupeau. La composante «besoins nutritionnels», essentiellement basée sur la vers...

Modeling Acequia Irrigation Systems Using System Dynamics: Model Development, Evaluation, and Sensitivity Analyses to Investigate Effects of Socio-Economic and Biophysical Feedbacks

“…Although no SD model will recreate reality, it can be deemed useful for its intended purpose (in our case scenario testing to investigate acequia community's places of resilience and vulnerability) upon successful model evaluation [51,59]. (Table 5) of the acequia model was comparable to other SD models (e.g., [53][54][55][56][57][58]. Although no SD model will recreate reality, it can be deemed useful for its intended purpose (in our case scenario testing to investigate acequia community's places of resilience and vulnerability) upon successful model evaluation [51,59].…”

Efficiency and stability in subtropical beef cattle grazing systems in the northwest of Argentina

“…Cattle size, maturing rate and milk production are important parameters in beef cattle production (Pang et al, 1999). The existence of optimal body size for specific environments has been investigated by numerous authors (Dickerson, 1970;Echols, 2011;Johnson et al, 2010).…”

Bioeconomic Model of Decision Support System for Farm Management: Proposal of a Mathematical Model

“…These equations imply that grazing animals consume different proportions of leaf, stem, and dead material, based on the level of selectivity and the preference parameters for each sward component (Machado, ). Therefore, the cattle grazing rate (GR) is estimated as follows (Pang et al ., ): where DMI m is the maximum dry matter intake of cattle in 1 ha based on nutrient requirements (kg/ha), Y is the forage biomass or yield (kg/ha), and Y 50 is the forage biomass at half of the maximum grazing rate (kg/ha). Using the cattle grazing rate associated with initial forage availability (AF 0 ), it is possible to estimate the final forage availability, a major output of the meteorological–soil–pasture–animal integration submodel that leads to decision making.…”