1992
DOI: 10.1107/s0108270191014531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of a cyclopenta[hi]indolizine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bond distances and angles for the indolizine skeleton in the title compound are closer to those of 1-acetoxy-2,3-diphenylindolizine (Wadsworth, Bender, Smith, Luss & Weidner, 1986) and ethyl 1-trifluoromethylindolizine-3-carboxylate (Pritchard, 1988), than to those of ethyl 3,4-dihydrocyclopenta[hOindolizine-1-carboxylate (Kakehi, Kitajima, Ito & Takusagawa, 1992); this is because, in contrast to the annelation of a five-membered ring at the 1 and 8 positions of an indolizine ring, the less-hindered pyrone ring attached to the 2 and 3 positions does not cause a large distortion of the skeleton. On the other hand, the distances and angles for the 2-pyrone ring are similar to those found in various 2-pyrone derivatives (Thailambal & Vasantha Pattabhi, 1987;Thailambal, Vasantha Pattabhi & Gabe, 1986), except for the shortened C3--C4 and lengthened C4---C11 bonds.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bond distances and angles for the indolizine skeleton in the title compound are closer to those of 1-acetoxy-2,3-diphenylindolizine (Wadsworth, Bender, Smith, Luss & Weidner, 1986) and ethyl 1-trifluoromethylindolizine-3-carboxylate (Pritchard, 1988), than to those of ethyl 3,4-dihydrocyclopenta[hOindolizine-1-carboxylate (Kakehi, Kitajima, Ito & Takusagawa, 1992); this is because, in contrast to the annelation of a five-membered ring at the 1 and 8 positions of an indolizine ring, the less-hindered pyrone ring attached to the 2 and 3 positions does not cause a large distortion of the skeleton. On the other hand, the distances and angles for the 2-pyrone ring are similar to those found in various 2-pyrone derivatives (Thailambal & Vasantha Pattabhi, 1987;Thailambal, Vasantha Pattabhi & Gabe, 1986), except for the shortened C3--C4 and lengthened C4---C11 bonds.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This distortion must be caused by the annelation at the 1-and 8-positions in the indolizine skeleton, as in ethyl 3,4-dihydrocyclopenta[ht]indolizine-l-carboxylate (Kakehi, Kitajima, Ito & Takusagawa, 1992a) in which there is a five-membered ring at the 1-and 8-positions of the indolizine ring. On the other hand, the furan ring attached to the 2-and 3-positions as well as the benzoyl group does not cause a large distortion of the indolizine skeleton.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bond distances and angles in the indolizine skeletons of (2a) and (2b) are similar to those in 1-acetoxy-2,3-diphenylindolizine (Wadsworth, Bender, Smith, Luss & Weidner, 1986), ethyl 1-trifluoromethylindolizine-3-carboxylate (Pritchard, 1988), ethyl 3,7-dimethyl-2-(p-methylbenzoyl)thieno [2,3-b]indolizine-9-carboxylate (Kakehi, Ito, Sakurai & Urushido, 1991), and 3-acetyl-6-methyl-2H-pyrano[2,3-b]indolizin-2-one (Kakehi, Kitajima, Ito & Takusagawa, 1992b). Those in (2b) are also similar to those in (2a) except for the shortened C8--N1 bond (1.402A) and enlarged N1--C8--C7 and N1--C8--C9 bond angles [119.6 (2) and 111.8 (2) °, respectively].…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%