2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.12.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of a Central-European mountain spruce old-growth forest with respect to historical development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(65 reference statements)
3
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies from Carpathian forests reported that the area of forest floor covered by stumps and logs amounted to approximately 4-10% (Szewczyk and Szwagrzyk 1996;Holeksa 1998;Holeksa et al 2007;Svoboda and Pouska 2008;Svoboda et al 2010). The area of woody microsites found in this study was low.…”
Section: Quantity and Quality Of Woody Micrositescontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies from Carpathian forests reported that the area of forest floor covered by stumps and logs amounted to approximately 4-10% (Szewczyk and Szwagrzyk 1996;Holeksa 1998;Holeksa et al 2007;Svoboda and Pouska 2008;Svoboda et al 2010). The area of woody microsites found in this study was low.…”
Section: Quantity and Quality Of Woody Micrositescontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…In this study, 30% of seedlings and 29% of saplings occurred on stumps or fallen deadwood. Other authors have reported that in a subalpine forest the population of Picea occupying woody microsites accounts for 20-80% of total regeneration (Holeksa et al 2007;Svoboda and Pouska 2008;Svoboda et al 2010). Several dozen years ago dead trees were still being removed from the forest in the Gorce Mountains, while active protection over the last three decades has also had an impact on the quantity and quality of different microsites.…”
Section: Types Of Microsites For Picea Regeneration In the Subalpine mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A deadwood inventory conducted in the montane zone in central Slovakia reported a mean volume of 143.5 m 3 /ha . Data from the Czech Šumava National Park from the year 2002 indicated 311 and 156 m 3 /ha (Svoboda and Pouska 2008), while a survey of a Japanese old-growth subalpine coniferous forest revealed 217.9 m 3 /ha (Fukasawa et al 2014). In boreal natural forests in the Petersburg region, deadwood volume ranged from 32 to 326 m 3 /ha (Shorohova and Shorohov 2001).…”
Section: Deadwood Volume and Forest Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the key factors responsible for the lower regeneration of spruce in the extracted plots is the absence of dead wood, since it decreases the pressure of competitive species, for which decomposing material is not an optimal substrate [1,[35][36][37]. The importance of dead wood in forest regeneration increases at higher altitudes [38], and it also maintains the necessary microclimate and protects the seedlings from intensive sunlight.…”
Section: Natural Regeneration Of the Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%