1986
DOI: 10.1107/s0108270186091941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of 3-methylxanthine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A range of noncovalent clusters with different cations are observed in the gas phase, in agreement with Szolomájer et al [10]. When ammonium acetate is added as a solvent modifier, abundant peaks correspond to tetrameric species with alkali metal and ammonium cations ( Figure 1a); for example [(3-MX) 4 [10,12,13] by many singly (Figure 1a), doubly (Figure 1b-d), and multiply (Figure 1d) charged species, making it difficult to identify which species are present because of the overlapping isotopic patterns.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A range of noncovalent clusters with different cations are observed in the gas phase, in agreement with Szolomájer et al [10]. When ammonium acetate is added as a solvent modifier, abundant peaks correspond to tetrameric species with alkali metal and ammonium cations ( Figure 1a); for example [(3-MX) 4 [10,12,13] by many singly (Figure 1a), doubly (Figure 1b-d), and multiply (Figure 1d) charged species, making it difficult to identify which species are present because of the overlapping isotopic patterns.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…3-Methylxanthine (3-MX) is an example of a small molecule that can form stable noncovalently bound supramolecular complexes in the gas phase [10]. 3-MX has been shown to selfassemble in the presence of alkali metals and ammonium ions to form clusters around a stabilizing cation, as shown in Structure1; the 3-MX purine base contains both hydrogen bond donor [NH (1) and O(2)) and acceptor (NH(7) and O(6)] groups [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrogen-bond topology: hydrogen-bond connectivities represented by means of: (a) our notation described in the text; (b) EMIl notation (Etter et ai., 1990); (c) EMB notation but taking into account RAHB (Gilli et al, 1989). Mastropaolo, Camerman & Camerman (1991); (k) Ohms, Guth, Hellner, DannOhl & Schweig (1984); (/) Schmalle, H~ggi & Dubler (1988); (m) Prout et al (1994); (n) Ferretti, Bertolasi, Gilli & Borea (1985); (o) Boer (1972); (t7) Bradshaw, Guynn, Wood, Wilson, Dalley & Izatt (1987); (q) Lowe, Schwalbe & Williams (1987); (r) Low, Tollin, Brand & Wilson (1986); (s) Watt, Martin, Duchamp, Mizsak, Nielson & Prairie (1988); (t) Smith, Bobe, Minnetian, Hope & Yanuck (1985). In the remaining examples (7 and 35-39), N.--O distances are rather short (2.734-2.856,~,), although the C:O and NH moieties apparently belong to a O---C--C--NmH non-conjugated moiety.…”
Section: -O Intermolecular Hydrogen Bondingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iv) In the case of 3-methyixanthine (Low, Tollin, Brand & Wilson, 1986), mentioned above as a case where the Patterson-method solution did not routinely refine to a full structural solution, the model obtained from the optimized rotation-function calculation did in fact refine routinely, evidence of a substantive advantage in using the present procedure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This problem can be manifest in several ways: (i) in structural determination attempts, on occasion, a fragment can be trapped into a false minimum (Low, Tollin, Brand & Wilson, 1986); (ii) full three-dimensional rotation functions are time consuming and often contain several potential solutions -it is not always possible to examine these adequately; (iii) if further building onto an oriented fragment is to be undertaken, the most precise orientation possible is obviously desirable at each stage -errors can easily proliferate.…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%