2021
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf1754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure motif–centric learning framework for inorganic crystalline systems

Abstract: Incorporation of physical principles in a machine learning (ML) architecture is a fundamental step toward the continued development of artificial intelligence for inorganic materials. As inspired by the Pauling’s rule, we propose that structure motifs in inorganic crystals can serve as a central input to a machine learning framework. We demonstrated that the presence of structure motifs and their connections in a large set of crystalline compounds can be converted into unique vector representations using an un… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solely relying on these pre-calculated atomic composition features implies that the model ignores any 3D-structural environment information within the materials and thus misses the key attributes used in reference physics based simulations [15,16]. However, we anticipate that combining both chemical composition along with some 3D-structural information inside of a more complex deep learning method may lead to a significantly more accurate voltage prediction; as it has been shown for other crystals' properties predictions [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Solely relying on these pre-calculated atomic composition features implies that the model ignores any 3D-structural environment information within the materials and thus misses the key attributes used in reference physics based simulations [15,16]. However, we anticipate that combining both chemical composition along with some 3D-structural information inside of a more complex deep learning method may lead to a significantly more accurate voltage prediction; as it has been shown for other crystals' properties predictions [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…13,14 Most of the ML models developed in computational materials science to date have been focused on individual scalar quantities. Common properties are those directly computed ab initio, such as the formation energy 11,15,16 , the shear-and bulk-moduli 11,15,17,18 , the band gap energy 11,16,18,19 , and the Fermi energy 11 . Additional targets include properties calculated from the ab initio output, which are typically performance metrics for a target application such as Seebeck coefficient 20,21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we take the approach of physics informed machine learning, which incorporates physical principles into machine learning (ML) models [5][6][7][8]30]. We find that the polyhedral formed by cations and nearby anions can serve as an important optimization target to the machine learning framework of crystal materials [31]. Therefore, we added the coordination number of the cation as an additional optimization objective to the previous contact map-based CSP algorithm, the CMCrystal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%