2022
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2021.3089739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure-Function Relationships in Muscle Fibres: MyoRobot Online Assessment of Muscle Fibre Elasticity and Sarcomere Length Distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether these potential interaction sites for DTT and H 2 O 2 translate to the effects seen in permeabilized muscle fibres and how they align with the proposed pathways in intact muscle fibres remains yet to be resolved. Further, it is unclear from the literature how and to what degree these ROS-mediated changes impact the axial elasticity of the fibre, as an important parameter for damage prevention, structural memory, and the ability to resist large strains [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether these potential interaction sites for DTT and H 2 O 2 translate to the effects seen in permeabilized muscle fibres and how they align with the proposed pathways in intact muscle fibres remains yet to be resolved. Further, it is unclear from the literature how and to what degree these ROS-mediated changes impact the axial elasticity of the fibre, as an important parameter for damage prevention, structural memory, and the ability to resist large strains [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values are associated with a margin of error (roughly ±0.1 µm) arising from a Gaussian distribution of all SLs within a field-of-view around the median SL. Such Gaussian distributions of SLs are thoroughly reported in the literature [ 41 , 59 , 60 ] and extensively discussed in a previous publication [ 61 ]. Once 140% resting length was reached, maximum passive axial restoration force was analysed and normalized to the single-fibre cross-sectional area to yield restoration stress.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%