2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.03.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure–function relationship studies of PTH(1–11) analogues containing D-amino acids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the agonist profile of MPTH(1-28) is similar to that of PTH(1-34), suggesting that N-terminal AA substitutions increasing a-helicity of the N-terminal domain (Okazaki et al, 2008) help maintain agonist activity of PTH(1-28) analogs. However, introduction of the same AA substitutions into more extensive C-terminal truncated peptides helps predominately to maintain agonist activity to stimulate G s -signaling, as reported by others (Shimizu et al, 2001(Shimizu et al, , 2004Caporale et al, 2009Caporale et al, , 2010Neerup et al, 2011). The structural basis for the greater capacity of PTH(1-28), [Gly 1 ,Arg 19 ]PTH(1-28), ZP2307, and MPTH(1-14) to stimulate receptor internalization is unclear but may be a result of C-terminal AAs present in PTH(1-31) providing a restraint on receptor internalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In contrast, the agonist profile of MPTH(1-28) is similar to that of PTH(1-34), suggesting that N-terminal AA substitutions increasing a-helicity of the N-terminal domain (Okazaki et al, 2008) help maintain agonist activity of PTH(1-28) analogs. However, introduction of the same AA substitutions into more extensive C-terminal truncated peptides helps predominately to maintain agonist activity to stimulate G s -signaling, as reported by others (Shimizu et al, 2001(Shimizu et al, , 2004Caporale et al, 2009Caporale et al, , 2010Neerup et al, 2011). The structural basis for the greater capacity of PTH(1-28), [Gly 1 ,Arg 19 ]PTH(1-28), ZP2307, and MPTH(1-14) to stimulate receptor internalization is unclear but may be a result of C-terminal AAs present in PTH(1-31) providing a restraint on receptor internalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…4). The N-terminal modifications, which typically include conformationally constraining amino acid analogs, such as a-amino isobutyric acid substituted at positions 1 and/or 3, also conferred detectable cAMP-signaling potency to the otherwise inactive PTH(1-11) peptide (Shimizu et al, 2001a(Shimizu et al, ,b, 2004, along with at least some a-helicity (Barazza et al, 2005;Fiori et al, 2007;Caporale et al, 2009aCaporale et al, ,b, 2010Cupp et al, 2013b). It thus may be that for the native ligand, the N-terminal domain becomes structurally more organized as an a-helix upon binding to the receptor (Shimizu et al, 2001b(Shimizu et al, , 2004, as has been suggested for other peptide ligands that bind to a family B GPCR (Parthier et al, 2009).…”
Section: B Parathyroid Hormone-related Proteinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, we decided to use both active and completely inactive analogues containing residues mimicking Val in position 2. The sensitive role of Val 2 has been demonstrated by the potency decrease due to the simple modification of the side chain orientation (Caporale et al 2009a). In this work, a CD and 2-D NMR conformational analysis was performed on the most relevant analogues synthesized.…”
Section: Abbreviationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some modifications recently introduced in position 2, such as a D-Val residue (Caporale et al 2009a), reduce or annihilate the activity of the most active PTH (1-11) analogue, H-Aib-Val-Aib-Glu-Ile-Gln-Leu-Nle-His-GlnHar-NH 2 (I). We interpreted this behaviour as the consequence of an unsuitable orientation of the Val side chain, rather than of an overall 3-D structural alteration caused by the presence of non-proteinogenic amino acids.…”
Section: Abbreviationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation