Structure–function–folding relationship in a WW domain

Abstract

Protein folding barriers result from a combination of factors including unavoidable energetic frustration from nonnative interactions, natural variation and selection of the amino acid sequence for function, and͞or selection pressure against aggregation. The rate-limiting step for human Pin1 WW domain folding is the formation of the loop 1 substructure. The native conformation of this six-residue loop positions side chains that are important for mediating protein-protein interactions through the binding of Pro-rich sequences. Replacement of the wild-type loop 1 primary structure by shorter sequences with a high propensity to fold into a type-I ␤-turn conformation or the statistically preferred type-I G1 bulge conformation accelerates WW domain folding by almost an order of magnitude and increases thermodynamic stability. However, loop engineering to optimize folding energetics has a significant downside: it effectively eliminates WW domain function according to ligand-binding studies. The energetic contribution of loop 1 to ligand binding appears to have evolved at the expense of fast folding and additional protein stability. Thus, the two-state barrier exhibited by the wild-type human Pin1 WW domain principally results from functional requirements, rather than from physical constraints inherent to even the most efficient loop formation process.␤-turn ͉ ligand binding ͉ protein folding ͉ ␤-sheet ͉ protein function G lobular proteins evolve by mutation and selection. Selection criteria include function, and sufficient thermodynamic stability and folding rate to avoid sustained chaperone binding and proteasome degradation. The selection criteria cannot always be optimized independently over the entire sequence of a protein. For the human Pin1 (hPin1) WW domain (Pin WW hereafter), we have shown that residues important for stability and folding rate are segregated in the sequence (1-4). It is likely that functional selection criteria are predominant once minimal energetic criteria are met. Therefore, sequence evolution to enhance function may lead to a decrease in protein stability and folding rate compared with a sequence optimized for folding energetics.The hPin1 cell cycle regulatory proline (Pro) cis͞trans-isomerase is a two-domain protein (5). In its physiological role, the N-terminal WW domain binds Pro-rich ligands of the consensus sequence (pS͞pT)P, whereas the C-terminal domain catalyzes the Pro cis͞ trans-isomerization at the pS͞pT-P peptide bond. NMR solution studies show that the two domains, which are connected by a flexible solvated linker, interact only weakly before ligand binding (6, 7). The structure of the isolated Pin WW domain is virtually superimposable on that of the WW domain in the two-domain hPin1 protein (8). Moreover, Pin WW exhibits sufficient thermodynamic stability for biophysical analysis, folds rapidly, and retains its ligand-binding function (3, 9). These attributes, combined with sequence information on Ͼ150 WW domain family members (10, 11), makes Pin WW an excellent small model p...

A polymer physics perspective on driving forces and mechanisms for protein aggregation

“…Given this, how do typical proteins avoid this problem at finite concentrations in vivo? Rapid and efficient folding is one way to avoid aggregation [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Additionally, there are quality control mechanisms to process and / or clear unfolded, misfolded, and aggregated proteins [15][16][17].…”

Optimal control of molecular dynamics using Markov state models

“…Conformational transitions are essential to the function of proteins, nucleic acids and other macromolecules. These transitions span large ranges of length scales, time scales and complexity, and include processes as important as folding [15,16], complex conformational rearrangements between native protein substates [17,18], and ligand binding [19]. MD simulations are becoming increasingly accepted as a tool to investigate both the structural and the dynamical features of these transitions at a level of detail that is beyond that accessible in laboratory experiments [20][21][22].…”

The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Enhances HER-2 Expression and Cellular Transformation via Its Interaction with Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase/Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Kinase 1

“…Pin1, a recently identified peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerase (PPIase), has two domains: a PPIase domain at its COOH terminus responsible for isomerization and a WW domain at the NH 2 terminus, which functions as a binding element specific to pSer/Thre-Pro motifs (18)(19)(20). Through these two domains, Pin1 binds to and isomerizes specific pSer/Thr-Pro motifs and catalytically induces conformational changes after phosphorylation.…”