2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-33696-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure Formation in Modified Gravity Cosmologies

Alexandre Barreira

Abstract: The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source• a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses• the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. AbstractWe study linear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 309 publications
(628 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A GW detection with an optical counterpart in LISA (0.1 mHz -0.1 Hz) will put a stronger conclusion to the GW speed. On the other hand, several works have shown that the cubic Galileon is disfavored by cosmic microwave background, baryon acoustic oscillations, integrated Sachs-Wolfe, and weak lensing [77][78][79][80] and, recently, it has been claimed that cosmological data favor the Galileon ghost condensate over ΛCDM [81]. Also, several recent works have shown that cosmological data cannot rule out KGB [82][83][84] and that the braiding might even be the inevitable limit of scalar-tensor theories should all future cosmological data continue to remain consistent with GR [90][91][92].…”
Section: Kinetic Gravity Braiding Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A GW detection with an optical counterpart in LISA (0.1 mHz -0.1 Hz) will put a stronger conclusion to the GW speed. On the other hand, several works have shown that the cubic Galileon is disfavored by cosmic microwave background, baryon acoustic oscillations, integrated Sachs-Wolfe, and weak lensing [77][78][79][80] and, recently, it has been claimed that cosmological data favor the Galileon ghost condensate over ΛCDM [81]. Also, several recent works have shown that cosmological data cannot rule out KGB [82][83][84] and that the braiding might even be the inevitable limit of scalar-tensor theories should all future cosmological data continue to remain consistent with GR [90][91][92].…”
Section: Kinetic Gravity Braiding Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shall mostly focus our attention on background solutions in the subset of Horndeski theories called kinetic gravity braiding [38,39]. KGB has become popular lately because of its consistency with the GW170817 bound on the gravitational wave speed [72][73][74][75][76] and a number of cosmological constraints [77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84]. Many important theories-quintessence, k-essence, cubic Galileon, Galileon ghost condensate, and GR, to name a few-are special cases of KGB (see Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) is statistically ruled out by cosmological data including weak lensing [57][58][59][60]. The rest of the quadratic and cubic sectors remain phenomenologically interesting when cosmological data is taken into consideration [61][62][63].…”
Section: Cubic Horndeski Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from this, the cubic sector is quite appealing since its static and spherically symmetric solutions are known to be free from ghost and gradient instabilities under perturbations of the metric and the scalar field [55,56]. It is worth mentioning that the cubic sector escapes the latest observational bounds on the speed of gravitational waves [2,26,27], though some works also claim that its cubic galileon limit (i.e, for which G 3 ∼ X) is inconsistent with the cosmic microwave background, baryon acoustic oscillations, and weak lensing [57][58][59][60]. Recent work has also shown that Horndeski theory remains phenomenologically viable even when cosmological observations are taken into consideration [61][62][63].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the standard model of cosmology (ΛCDM ) has suffered with the explanation of the cause of the acceleration of the expansion of the universe at least without inclusion of cosmological constant. Moreover, there are important open questions in active theoretical and observational cosmology such as the horizon problem, the flatness problem, the monopole problem, the origin and fate of the universe, the formation of the primordial universe, the inhomogeneity and anisotropy of the universe [10,11,12,13], the way cosmological perturbations and primordial fluctuations of the early universe produced the large scale structures, and how the astropysical objects such as stars, galaxies were formed and how they have evolved [14,15,16,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%