2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41565-023-01321-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure, folding and flexibility of co-transcriptional RNA origami

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
4
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where possible, we measured the deviation in TM-score, GDT_TS, INF, INF_WC, and lDDT between distinct experimentally captured conformations (red lines in Figure 2 ). More specifically, we compared the following structure pairs in targets with multiple conformations (see also Table 1 ): the point- mutations for the CPEB3 ribozyme 59 (R1107 vs R1108), the apo and holo structures of the aptamer Apta-FRET 60 (R1136), the young and mature conformations of 6HBC 61 (R1138), the four cryo-EM classes for the SL5 domain of the bat coronavirus HKU5 (R1156), and finally the RNA structures for the RsmZ-RsmA RNA-protein complexes with six vs. four proteins bound (R1189 vs R1190). In addition, for two cases, we measured the deviation between different models derived from the same experimental data (black lines in Figure 2 ), comparing distinct models built into the same cryo-EM density maps for the SL5 domains of SARS-CoV-2 (R1149) and BtCov-HKU5 (R1156).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Where possible, we measured the deviation in TM-score, GDT_TS, INF, INF_WC, and lDDT between distinct experimentally captured conformations (red lines in Figure 2 ). More specifically, we compared the following structure pairs in targets with multiple conformations (see also Table 1 ): the point- mutations for the CPEB3 ribozyme 59 (R1107 vs R1108), the apo and holo structures of the aptamer Apta-FRET 60 (R1136), the young and mature conformations of 6HBC 61 (R1138), the four cryo-EM classes for the SL5 domain of the bat coronavirus HKU5 (R1156), and finally the RNA structures for the RsmZ-RsmA RNA-protein complexes with six vs. four proteins bound (R1189 vs R1190). In addition, for two cases, we measured the deviation between different models derived from the same experimental data (black lines in Figure 2 ), comparing distinct models built into the same cryo-EM density maps for the SL5 domains of SARS-CoV-2 (R1149) and BtCov-HKU5 (R1156).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'young' and 'mature' structures do not differ in their Watson-Crick-Franklin helices but, to interconvert, would require breaking of a kissing loop interaction, twisting of the two kissing elements about their helical axes, and then reformation of the kissing loop. 60 None of the CASP models produced models close to the 'young' structure. Other natural and designed RNA systems are known to display similar kinetic traps and topological isomers 65,66 , and it will be interesting to see if in future CASPs, such conformations can be blindly predicted.…”
Section: Topologically Accurate Casp15 Rna Models Miss Detailed Featu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leveraging the algorithmic toolkit of nucleic acid nanotechnology [14][15][16], here we introduce a systematic method for expressing designer biomolecular condensates from synthetic RNA nanostructures. Our elementary motifs consist of star-shaped junctions, or nanostars, which fold co-transcriptionally and assemble thanks to programmable base-pairing interactions, forming liquid or gel-like condensates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nucleic acid nanotechnology facilitates the precise assembly of nucleic acid molecules into nanostructures with tailored sizes, shapes, and chemical compositions. These programmable nanostructures, characterized by their controllable synthesis process and excellent biocompatibility, have found diverse applications in fields, such as cell protein translation, cell motion, and immune activation . Recently, single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) origamis have been extensively explored as a promising platform that can be transcribed from DNA templates and self-folded into defined structures both in vitro and in vivo . , These ssRNA origamis can be equipped with various “structure” or “sequence” modules to enrich specific biomedical functions, including drug delivery, gene editing, , regulation of molecular interactions, , and the facilitation of high-resolution structural characterization. , Though many endowed properties have been brought from external structural motifs and sequences to ssRNA origami, the versatility and the function of the intrinsic RNA molecular signature of RNA structures have not been fully utilized. The integration of functional modules at the “molecular” level holds significant potential for further expanding and diversifying the applications of ssRNA origami nanotechnology .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 These ssRNA origamis can be equipped with various "structure" or "sequence" modules to enrich specific biomedical functions, including drug delivery, 15 gene editing, 9,16 regulation of molecular interactions, 17,18 and the facilitation of high-resolution structural characterization. 18,19 Though many endowed properties have been brought from external structural motifs and sequences to ssRNA origami, the versatility and the function of the intrinsic RNA molecular signature of RNA structures have not been fully utilized. The integration of functional modules at the "molecular" level holds significant potential for further expanding and diversifying the applications of ssRNA origami nanotechnology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%