The control of matter properties (transport, magnetic, dielectric,. . . ) using synthesis as thin films is strongly hindered by the lack of reliable theories, able to guide the design of new systems, through the understanding of the interface effects and of the way the substrate constraints are imposed to the material. The present paper analyses the energetic contributions at the interfaces, and proposes a model describing the microscopic mechanisms governing the interactions at an epitaxial interface between a manganite and another transition metal oxide in perovskite structure (as for instance SrTiO3). The model is checked against experimental results and literature analysis.The technological importance of spin valves or spin injectors as potential applications of manganese oxides induced a large number of works on manganite thin films 2,3 . For this reason the lost of magnetization of La 2/3 Sr 1/3 MnO 3 (LSMO) or La 2/3 Ca 1/3 MnO 3 (LCMO) near an SrTiO 3 (STO) interface has been the subject of many interpretations. Let us cite (i) homogeneous substrate strain 4 (ii) electronic and/or chemical phase separation 5 related to structural inhomogeneities at the interface 6 , (iii) manganese e g orbital reconstruction inducing C-type antiferromagnetism 7,8 . None of these interpretations however provide a good understanding of the observed phenomena. For instance, it was shown that an homogeneous substrate strain of the in-plane parameters does not relax for film thickness smaller than 1000Å 5 , while a drastic change in the transport properties is observed for films thinner than a few unit cells (∼ 3 − 4 on STO substrate 7,9 , ∼ 30 on LaAlO 3 substrate 7 ,. . . ). In the second hypothesis (ii), there is no clear proposition of the nature of the inhomogeneities, their origin, the way they may act in order to induce the observed properties. Finally, ferromagnetic hysteresis loops were found in very thin films up to only three unit cells 9 (u.c.), in contradiction with the proposed C-type AFM ordering resulting from orbital ordering (iii). In any case, whatever the reasons put forward, the existence of a so-called "dead layer" at the interface between the manganite film and most perovskite substrates seems to be established 9,10 . This "dead layer" is of a few unit cells width and exhibits a large decrease of the conductivity ; however its origin is not at all understood.We believe that a careful analysis allow us to infer a model for the interface effects between a manganite and an oxide substrate with a perovskite structure. The main concepts of our model can be summarized as an energy balance at the interface.• It is well known that the strongest effect of the substrate is to constrain the film inplane cell parameters to fit the substrate ones. a film = a substrate b film = b substrate This constraint is quite strong since it is associated with bond elongation, i.e. the most energetic vibrational modes 11 . It thus relaxes slowly (not before 250 u.c., 1000Å, on a STO substrate 5 ). In the literature, it is associ...